Welcome to The Fleet Facto®y!

Est. 2946
 
Standalone Ships:

Type	Name	Melt value	Upgrade value	Price
CCU'd	Vulture LTI	$115	$175	$155
CCU'd	Constellation Taurus LTI	$130	$190	$169
CCU'd	Vulcan LTI	$140	$200	$179
CCU'd	Hurricane LTI	$125	$210	$179
CCU'd	Terrapin LTI	$135	$220	$185
CCU'd	Constellation Andromeda LTI	$155	$240	$199
CCU'd	Scorpius LTI	$135	$240	$199
CCU'd	Corsair LTI	$155	$250	$205
CCU'd	400i LTI	$165	$250	$209
CCU'd	Ares Inferno LTI	$135	$250	$199
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI	$145	$260	$209
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI BIS 2952	$155	$260	$219
CCU'd	Vanguard Warden LTI	$145	$260	$209
CCU'd	Vanguard Sentinel LTI	$160	$275	$225
CCU'd	Retaliator Bomber LTI	$160	$275	$225
CCU'd	Apollo Medivac LTI	$160	$275	$225
CCU'd	Vanguard Harbinger LTI	$175	$290	$239
CCU'd	Eclipse LTI	$165	$300	$239
CCU'd	Constellation Aquila LTI	$175	$310	$245
CCU'd	Mole LTI	$180	$315	$249
CCU'd	Redeemer LTI	$185	$325	$255
CCU'd	Caterpillar LTI	$170	$330	$255
CCU'd	Starfarer Gemini LTI	$180	$340	$259
CCU'd	Crucible LTI	$190	$350	$269
CCU'd	Endeavor LTI	$190	$350	$275
CCU'd	Glaive LTI	$190	$350	$295
CCU'd	Hull C LTI	$165	$350	$249
CCU'd	Valkyrie LTI	$215	$375	$285
CCU'd	Galaxy LTI	$220	$380	$289
CCU'd	Reclaimer LTI	$240	$400	$299
CCU'd	C2 Hercules LTI	$200	$400	$285
CCU'd	Hull D LTI	$240	$450	$315
CCU'd	600i Explorer LTI	$265	$475	$339
CCU'd	M2 Hercules LTI	$310	$520	$375
CCU'd	Liberator LTI	$365	$575	$409
CCU'd	Carrack LTI	$390	$600	$425
CCU'd	Merchantman LTI	$390	$650	$439
CCU'd	Perseus LTI	$415	$675	$455
CCU'd	Odyssey LTI	$440	$700	$469
CCU'd	Hammerhead	$465	$725	$485
CCU'd	Nautilus LTI	$465	$725	$489
CCU'd	A2 Hercules LTI	$405	$750	$469
CCU'd	Polaris LTI	$490	$750	$499

Special offers, limited numbers:

Type	Name	Upgrade value	Price	Quantity

 
Ship and Vehicle Upgrades:

Type	Name	Price
AEGIS
CCU	325A to Avenger Titan Renegade	$10
CCU	Reliant Kore to Avenger Titan Renegade	$18
CCU	Reliant Tana to Avenger Warlock	$18
CCU	325A to Avenger Warlock	$25
CCU	315P to Avenger Warlock	$30
CCU	Vanguard Harbinger to Eclipse	$18
CCU	Cutlass Black to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	M50 to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	Odyssey to Hammerhead	$45
CCU	Odyssey to Nautilus	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Reclaimer	$45
CCU	Gladiator to Sabre	$11
CCU	Super Hornet to Sabre Comet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Sabre Comet	$25
CCU	Terrapin to Vanguard Hoplite	$25
CCU	Apollo Triage to Vanguard Warden	$18
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Vanguard Warden	$39
CCU	Sabre Comet to Vulcan	$25
CCU	Super Hornet to Vulcan	$32
ANVIL
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Ballista	$11
CCU	Liberator to Carrack	$44
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Crucible	$18
CCU	Prospector to Gladiator	$17
CCU	Reliant Mako to Hawk	$11
CCU	Gladius to Hawk	$17
CCU	Sabre Comet to Hornet Heartseeker	$18
CCU	Super Hornet to Hornet Heartseeker	$26
CCU	Prospector to Hornet Wildfire	$32
CCU	Vulcan to Hurricane	$18
CCU	Taurus to Hurricane	$32
CCU	F7C Hornet to Legionnaire	$18
CCU	Mustang Beta to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Arrow to Spartan	$11
CCU	Hornet Wildfire to Super Hornet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Khartu-Al to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Gladiator to Super Hornet	$25
CCU	Prospector to Super Hornet	$39
CCU	Vulcan to Terrapin	$33
CCU	Crucible to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Endeavor to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Hull C to Valkyrie	$44
AOPOA / XI'AN
CCU	Gladiator to Khartu-Al	$11
CCU	Prospector to Khartu-Al	$25
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Nox	$11
CCU	X1 Base to Nox Kue	$12
CCU	Vulcan to San'tok.Yai	$33
ARGO
CCU	Mustang Alpha to MPUV Cargo	$11
CCU	Razor to SRV	$11
CCU	Tracker to SRV	$18
BANU
CCU	Andromeda to Merchantman	$279
CONSOLIDATED OUTLAND
CCU	Avenger Stalker to Mustang Delta	$10
CCU	300i to Mustang Delta	$17
CRUSADER
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Inferno	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Ion	$18
CCU	Valkyrie to Genisis Starliner	$44
CCU	Nautilus to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Hammerhead to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Hercules C2	$44
CCU	400i to Mercury Star Runner	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Mercury Star Runner	$33
DRAKE
CCU	Cutlass Black to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Hawk to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	M50 to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Mole to Caterpillar	$25
CCU	Sabre to Cutlass Blue	$11
CCU	Prospector to Cutlass Blue	$32
CCU	Reliant Tana to Herald	$17
CCU	325A to Herald	$24
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Mule	$11
CCU	Andromeda to Corsair	$18
KRUGER
MISC
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Endeavor	$18
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Expanse	$17
CCU	Sabre to Freelancer MIS	$10
CCU	Gladiator to Freelancer MIS	$17
CCU	Prospector to Freelancer MIS	$33
CCU	Spartan to Hull A	$17
CCU	Arrow to Hull A	$23
CCU	Cutlass Red to Hull B	$11
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Hull C	$18
CCU	Prowler to Hull D	$19
CCU	Perseus to Odyssey	$44
CCU	Tracker to Razor	$11
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Razor	$17
CCU	Hornet Ghost to Razor	$32
CCU	Razor to Razor LX	$11
CCU	Tracker to Razor LX	$17
CCU	Freelancer MAX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Razor LX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Retaliator Base to Razor EX	$11
CCU	325A to Reliant Tana	$10
CCU	Arrow to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	Reliant Tana to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	325A to Reliant Sen	$24
CCU	Gladius to Reliant Mako	$10
CCU	325A to Reliant Mako	$36
CCU	Mole to Starfarer Gemini	$41
CCU	Starfarer to Starfarer Gemini	$58
ORIGIN
CCU	Dragonfly Black to 100i	$17
CCU	Ursa Rover to 125A	$17
CCU	Avenger Titan to 125A	$12
CCU	100i to 125A	$17
CCU	125A to 135C	$11
CCU	300i to 135C	$17
CCU	Mustang Gamma to 135C	$17
CCU	Andromeda to 400i	$18
CCU	Aurora CL to 85X	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12R Racing	$11
CCU	Avenger Stalker to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12 to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12R Racing to G12A Military	$11
CCU	Reliant Mako to M50 Interceptor	$11
CCU	Gladius to M50 Interceptor	$17
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Velocity to X1 Force	$11
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Force	$17
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Force	$17
RSI
CCU	Apollo Triage to Apollo Medivac	$38
CCU	Vanguard Warden to Apollo Medivac	$27
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Apollo Triage	$26
CCU	Aurora MR to Aurora LX	$11
CCU	Razor to Mantis	$10
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Mantis	$18
CCU	Hammerhead to Polaris	$45
CCU	85X to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
CCU	X1 Force to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
TUMBRIL
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RC	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone TR	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RN	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone AA	$37
CCU	Cyclone RC to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone TR to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone RN to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone	$11
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RC	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone TR	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RN	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone AA	$45
CCU	300i to Cyclone RC	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone TR	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone RN	$11
CCU	325a to Cyclone MT	$18
CCU	Arrow to Cyclone AA	$11
CCU	F7C Hornet to Nova Tank	$17
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger CV	$11
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger RC	$11
CCU	Ranger CV to Ranger TR	$11
CCU	Ranger RC to Ranger TR	$11

 
Paints:

Ship	Name	Price
Aegis Avenger	Blue and gold ILW 2950	$15
Aegis Avenger	Solar Winds Paint	$15
Aegis Gladius	Solar Winds Paint	$18
Aegis Vanguard	Solar Winds Paint	$22
Anvil Arrow	Twilight ILW 2950	$15
Anvil Legionnaire	Shadow Strike Paint	$18
Anvil Valkyrie	Splinter ILW 2950	$24
Anvil Liberator	Condor	$35
Crusader Mercury	Fortuna	$23
Cursader Spirit	Crimson	$20
Cursader Spirit	Intrepid	$20
Cursader Spirit	Olympia	$20
Drake Dragonfly	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Scull and Crossbones	$19
Drake Buccaneer	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Caterpillar	Ghoulish Green	$22
Drake Herald	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Mule	Ghoulish Green	$14
Drake Mule	Smokestack	$9
Drake Vulture	Ghoulish Green	$20
Gatac Railen	Hyaotan	$23
Greycat STV	Blue Steel	$9
Misc Freelancer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$23
Misc Starfarer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$43
Misc Expanse	Stardust	$20
Origin 400i	Fortuna	$23
Origin 400i	Penumbra	$23
Origin 400i	Meridian	$23
Origin 600i	Fortuna	$29
RSI Aurora	Blue and gold ILW2950	$15
RSI Constellation	Blue and gold ILW2950	$22
RSI Scorpius	Stinger	$25

 
BUKs, modules and more:

Type	Name	Insurance	Melt value	Price

 
Other:

Type	Name	Price
Flair	Gamescom 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Gamescom 2946 trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 trophy	sold out
Flair	Citizencon 2947 trophy	$11

 

• CCU = Cross-Chassis Upgrade. • Melt value = what you get if you decide to exchange your ship for store credits. • Upgrade value = this is the value you upgrade from if you decide to do that. • LTI = Lifetime insurance. • MI = Month insurance. • OC = Original Concept. • Prices include PayPal fees. PayPal invoice will be sent. • Buyer must be PayPal verified, I am since 2008. • I do not have a Discord account and I do not middleman! • HOW TO BUY: PM me what you would like to buy together with your PayPal email. I will then send you an invoice. Once the invoice has been paid the bought item will be gifted to your PayPal email. You will then receive a mail from RSI which contains a gift link. The link transfers the gift to your Hangar (RSI website, if you are logged in, or it will ask you to do so). • If you are interested - send me a PM. My down time is usually between 11 pm - 7 am UTC (CET) 

Have a good day!

Introduction
Hey and welcome to the WikipediaPageCreation subreddit! This is a subreddit dedicated to discovering and exploring various methods and strategies of securing Wikipedia pages for a brand or person. My name is Nikolas Lemmel and I’m the team-lead at a boutique digital agency by the name of Maximatic Media. As we’ve spent the last couple of years dissecting the art of Wikipedia page creation, I’ve decided to open this sub in hopes of sparking a discussion on various impactful and non-impactful factors affecting the creation of stickied Wikipedia pages. I’m hoping to start the birth of this sub off strong so I’m gonna try to provide an in-depth overview of what we’ve learned about creating and stabilizing Wikipedia pages thus far as a company in this post. If you have any experience with either of the components I’ll be mentioning or would like to share one that we’ve yet to cover, please feel free to comment down below.
Page Stickiness
Let’s start this journey by first recognizing the weird word I’ve used like 3-4x in the introduction: “stickied”. This is a word you’ll see appear often the deeper dive into the Wikipedia publishing world.
The concept of "stickiness" in the context of Wikipedia publishing has to do with the longevity and resilience of a newly published Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is an open-source platform that relies on volunteer editors to maintain the quality of content on the site. These editors follow a set of guidelines to decide what content is notable and reliable enough to appear on Wikipedia.
When a new page is created, it undergoes scrutiny from higher-tier editors and admins, who assess whether the page meets Wikipedia's stringent notability and reliability criteria. If they decide that it doesn't, the page can be deleted or heavily revised, oftentimes within a matter of days from its publishing date. This constant monitoring and removal process is part of Wikipedia's commitment to maintaining a high-quality, reliable source of information and minimizing the extent to which Wikipedia is used in an advertorial fashion.
Stickiness, therefore, refers to the ability of a new page to withstand this scrutiny and remain live on the site. A stickied page is one that has been well-constructed, sufficiently sourced with credible references, and clearly meets the notability requirements. The page not only gets published but also stays published, or "sticks.”
Now, this may already be common knowledge to the bulk of you that are actively researching Wikipedia page creation for your brand. However, since we’ve launched our service, we’ve dealt with a lot of clientele who have attempted to create a Wikipedia page for themselves in the past and were hit with this harsh reality check. An alarming percentage of those cases fell prey to freelancers or companies specializing in Wikipedia publishing that charged them anywhere between $600 - $2000 to draft and publish a Wikipedia page, knowing full well that there was absolutely zero chance that the page would actually remain on Wikipedia. Not an outright scam, mind you, but very much bordering on one in my point of view.
The truth of the matter is that 95% of entities seeking a Wikipedia page do not truly warrant one and this statement is corroborated by Wikipedia’s own statistic, stating that a mind-boggling 98% of newly published pages get nominated for deletion. So how do we combat these ridiculously low odds? Well, let’s delve into what’s arguably the biggest factor of all when it comes to page stickiness:
Notability
So diving right into the nitty-gritty of Wikipedia Publishing, we must first cover the concept of notability - the most important aspect out of all of the points I’ll be covering in this guide. Notability in the context of Wikipedia simply means how often reputable, secondary sources are referencing you in their media output. Said references come in many forms, whether it be a full feature article, a short bio in a listicle or just a basic citation. However, not all references are made equal. Some references carry significantly more weight than others, either due to its “comprehensiveness” (i.e. a full feature article with the sole focus being on you) or the “reputability” of the source doing the referencing (i.e. mentioned in Forbes vs mentioned in “Biznes-News-Blog”).
Comprehensiveness
Let’s first delve into the topic of comprehensiveness. The comprehensiveness of your reference can be calculated by just a couple factors: the word count of the article, the keyword density of your entity’s name within said article and whether the entity is being referenced in the title/headline of the article. These three components determine the significance laid upon the entity by the reporting outlet. The more extensive the coverage, the higher the significance in the eyes of Wikipedia (i.e. a full-feature, 750-word article on Forbes vs a 150 word entry in “Top 30 E-Commerce Businesses of 2023” listicle on Forbes).
Reputability
Now that we’ve covered what I mean by “comprehensiveness”, let’s talk about the other component influencing the power of your media coverage: reputability. The concept of reputability is basically as straightforward as it gets. Just about any semi-famous news or media outlet that you can think of is viewed as a “reputable” source by Wikipedia. The likes of Forbes, Mashable, USA Today, etc are all stellar examples of significant coverage that corroborates you or your brand as a notable entity in the eyes of Wikipedia. However, a full feature article on each of those aforementioned sites costs $15,000, $2,400 and $6,500 respectively. If you as an entity see no utility in being featured on these media outlets beyond simply meeting the eligibility criteria for a Wikipedia page, it makes little sense to purchase those placements.
The Role of Domain Authority
This is where a more esoteric metric comes into play: Domain Authority. A DA score is effectively a ranking assigned to a domain which we can use to assess any given site’s authority in comparison to the rest of the web. It is calculated using the domain’s age, the amount of other sites referring to it and the reputability of said referrals. Basically the same criteria influencing the site’s probability of getting their own stickied Wiki page but quantified by a score from 1 to 100. Now let’s return back to three examples of reputable media outlets I’ve given above: Forbes, Mashable and USA Today. Forbes has a DA score of 95, Mashable has a DA score of 92 and USA Today has a DA score of 94. So all in all, all three publications are highly renowned, outpacing the vast majority of other sites on the web with scores of 90 and above. However, if referring back to the pricing of each placement, we see a pretty drastic incongruence with the value derived from each media outlet in the context of GKP creation. Forbes, despite being one measly basis point off of USA Today’s DA score, carries more than a 200% higher price tag. Now sure, Forbes has a significantly higher readership and holds far more clout than USA Today but if focusing solely on its impact in the context of a Wikipedia reference, it really doesn’t warrant the price you pay for it when compared to other viable alternatives.
And these are just the three sites we’ve mentioned so far. Take a look at the following spreadsheet containing 400+ available media placements and keep an eye on the DA column:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SX7bI0YSZeJCWwxaMEZ1LG-QtoiLFnDVJZjW1n-ZvQ0/edit?usp=sharing
As you scroll through, you’ll find that there are a plethora of Google-News-Approved sites that have a relatively high DA despite costing a fraction of what the internationally distinguished media outlets cost. Sites like Village Voice, HackerNoon, Times of Malta, Chiang Rai Times, etc. Now granted, they don’t exactly pack the same sort of punch that Forbes does but in the context of a Wikipedia page, you are considerably better off securing five B-tier placements in comparison to a singular A tier placement. So long as you are not cheaping out by opting for “Biznes-News-Blog” as your referring source and stick to Google-News-Approved publications, a varied list of reputable placements within your references section will take you much further than just one extremely reputable citation.
Reliability
Now that we’ve extensively covered the topic of notability, let’s talk about a factor of media assessment that is unique to Wikipedia: Reliability. Reliability is Wikipedia’s way of determining how trustworthy the source of incoming information is. It’s one of the only ORM services that views this factor as being separate from notability, which makes the process of selecting publications a bit more complex.
As a PR agency, we deal with a lot of ORM requests ranging from Google Knowledge Panels to Wikipedia Publishing to Social Media Verifications on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and Youtube. Theoretically, say that we receive a client seeking to get verified on all social platforms, get a GKP and get a Wikipedia page published about them. All in all, the works. Let’s say that they also came to us with a decent bit of pre-existing media coverage and have full feature articles about them published on the Daily Mail, Newsweek, RT News, OK Magazine and E! News.
Now, in the context of GKP Creation and Social Media Verification, we would notify this imaginary client that we are prepared to move forward with their case and are relatively optimistic about their probability of success. Given that their PR stems from highly recognizable publications with DAs in the high 80s/90s, there is little reason to suspect that they’d get rejected on the basis of notability. However, when it comes to Wikipedia, we unfortunately would have to reject this case and I’ll explain why. Despite the fact that each of those publications is considered notable by Wikipedia’s standards (which more or less follow the same criteria as Google and Meta mind you), not a single one of those listed outlets is viewed as a trustworthy source by Wikipedia. Newsweek is viewed as a biased news reporter, RT News is viewed as propagandized and state-run media, and Daily Mail, OK Mag and E! News are all considered low-quality, tabloid-like sources of information. Creating a Wikipedia page with only these articles as citations is basically a guaranteed nomination for deletion waiting to happen.
This is largely why, when purchasing press for Wikipedia, you want to stick to media outlets that are independent, journalistic sources with a good reputation behind them. So going back to the spreadsheet of PR placements, sites like Times of Malta and Chiang Rai Times are good examples of reputable, independent news sites that meet the notability criteria whilst remaining relatively affordable. The cream of the crop, however, would be publications like Wisconsin State Journal, Arizona Daily Star, Sacramento Bee, Miami Herald, etc. Localized, independent news sources that have a significant amount of authority within their local domains while having an international readership similar to that of the NYT and Chicago Tribune.
Lastly, let’s talk about press releases from reputable sites like Yahoo, Bloomberg, Business Insider, etc. Wikipedia views press releases, especially those bought from press release aggregators, with a measure of suspicion, considering them as 'purchased' content. Purchasing these is really like blowing money down the drain since these can only be used as secondary sources. Stay away from these and stick only to editorial articles — those written by the staff of the publication and not distributed through the plethora of press release services out there.
The Question of Quantity
A pretty common question we get asked in our Wikipedia publishing consultations with clients is what amount of references guarantees a stickied page. What is the absolute minimum that I can get away with? And truth be told, we honestly have a hard time answering this question as we don’t truly know. Without foreseeing the future and knowing which admin gets assigned to review the page and what their opinion is on each referring publication, it is impossible to predict the actual amount. In our experience of creating Wikipedia pages over the last couple of years, we’ve found no shortage of BS reasons given for rejecting a specific source. The way Wikipedia is organized, it really just comes down to luck. We’ve witnessed a client get a stickied page with just five references and we’ve also witnessed a client get their page deleted with upwards of 15 strong references.
Having said that though, if taking into account the median number of references across all of our successful cases, a good benchmark to aim for would be roughly 6 semi-strong, corroborating references with a DA of 75 and above. Again, this number is not set-in-stone and may vary contingent on the entity (living persons oftentimes given more leniency than corporate brands) but six is basically the optimal zone. In the event an admin decides to reject one of the citations, the page still has five other references to fall back on, making it difficult to argue a lack of notability within a nomination vote. But if you really wanna take your chances, three strong references is the absolute minimum. Just be aware that you are fully at the mercy of the admin in this scenario.
“Veteran” Editor Accounts
Now that we have finally finished covering the most important factor impacting your Wiki page’s stickiness, let’s move onto what is likely the 2nd most important factor: the Wiki account doing the publishing. Let’s imagine for a second that we have a ready-to-go Wikipedia article that is well-constructed, worded in an objective, non-advertorial manner and contains plenty of citations from reputable sources verifying each and every piece of factual information within the article. Now, let’s imagine that we take this exact same article, word-for-word and publish it from two separate editor accounts. One of those accounts has been around for 7+ years and has made 3,000+ edits across various existing pages alongside the 300+ pages they’ve created and published themselves. The other account was registered three days ago, has zero experience editing other people’s entries, and their very first edit is about to be a brand new page that very few people ever heard of, despite how well-cited it may be.
Assuming they both publish the exact same content, word-for-word with the same references section, who do you think will receive more scrutiny over the brand new page from admins? The guy who’s been around for close to a decade and has a historical track record of quality contributions? Or the guy who literally just made an account on Wikipedia and decided that publishing a page about a little-known entity is a good first step in his life-long Wikipedia journey?
I think that’s really all that can be said about this topic as it's quite straightforward. Aged accounts with a history of edits simply tend to be more trusted when it comes to new page creation than accounts that are brand new. If you have a semi-strong page with somewhat questionable references, the reputation and history of the editor doing the publishing can be the thing that nudges it over the edge of acceptance.
That’s partially why we charge $1,500 for our Wikipedia publishing service. No one should pay fifteen hundred bucks to write a 400 word entry about their brand, that’s obscene. You pay for the privilege of being published by a somewhat renown Wikipedia editor, minimizing the degree to which your entry elicits suspicion and thus, maximizing your chances of success.
Drafting the Page
Now that we’ve covered the two most important aspects influencing your page’s stickiness probability, let’s move onto the last and arguably, least important factor out of them all: the actual writing. Now don’t get me wrong, a poorly written page is still very much a massive red flag when entering the sandbox stage. However, the knowledge required to write an objective, Wikipedia-compliant page is far more prevalent and less clandestine than the knowledge required to make the entity eligible for one.
Just read about a dozen or so pages on living persons and emulate the language and writing style used by the editors to the best degree you can. Assuming that you are a native speaker and don’t have any glaring grammatical errors within your writing, nine times out of ten, the page ends up being eligible for publishing. We’ve had plenty of clients write their own pages that required little to no editing on our side prior to being published.
There’s not much I can add to this that hasn’t already been covered by Wikipedia themselves (which you can read on this link here:). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons
Aside from the common tidbits of knowledge such as not using promotional language or writing in an informal tone, my one piece of unorthodox advice is to not go overboard with the length of the article. The shorter your page is, the lower the attack surface. The best pages are those that have just a couple of paragraphs in them, ranging between 200 and 350 words. The longer your page is, the higher the chances that you may get flagged for some factoid that didn’t get referenced enough within the sources you’ve cited to be considered “factually verifiable”.
Keep it to a minimum and only write about things that are easily fact-checked and warrant being on Wikipedia. Beyond that, just refer to Wikipedia’s own guidelines for written content and read a couple of pages for a quick inspo-sesh.
Conclusion
Given that we’ve covered each aspect of Wikipedia creation worth mentioning, let’s do a brief overview given that this post ended up being far longer than I had initially anticipated. We've dug deep into the nitty-gritty world of Wikipedia publishing, dissected the perplexing idea of "stickiness", navigated through the labyrinth of notability, comprehensiveness, reputability, and reliability, and peered into the halls of "Veteran" editor accounts.
So, let’s summarize what we’ve learned. Wikipedia's demanding notability and reliability criteria mean you can't simply grab any media coverage and hope it sticks. Quality over quantity, friends. Be discerning in your source selection, aim for varied, reputable sources, and steer clear of low-quality, biased outlets. You need to be strategic and smart about it. A Wikipedia page isn’t a walk in the park, it's a marathon, demanding preparation, skill, and persistence.
Never forget the importance of the account that does the publishing. An aged, trusted account can make the difference between sailing through or sinking like a stone. And remember, Wikipedia is not a billboard. It’s not about shouting your brand or achievements from the rooftops, it’s about providing an unbiased, informative, well-referenced and worthwhile contribution to the collective human knowledge.
We've shared the tricks of the trade, the ins, the outs, and the in-betweens of securing your Wikipedia page and have hopefully proven ourselves to be an above-average service provider of Wikipedia Publishing Services in the process.
Hopefully, y’all found this sub’s first post to be useful and a good introduction into the world of Wikipedia publishing. Myself and my team member, Marcus will be sticking around for an AMA on this post in case people have questions regarding any of the factors we’ve covered in this guide. Don’t forget guys, we started this subreddit out of the desire to make the process of securing a Wikipedia page less daunting and more of a community endeavor. It's a place where we can share our triumphs and challenges, learn from each other, and navigate the Wikipedia landscape together. So whether you’re a newbie trying to secure your own page or a PMarketing professional with years of experience in the field, please do not hesitate to share your journeys along with any factors you’ve found to have an impact that we failed to cover in the guide.
Let’s make WikipediaPageCreation the focal point of every Wikipedian’s self-publishing endeavor!

• Nikolas Lemmel Maximatic Media

If you’re one of the fortunate few who is unaware of this, essentially, the rumours go that Hindley and another notorious serial killer named Rosemary “Rose” West had a brief ‘fling’ at Durham in 1995, then broke it off and became enemies over who was more famous.
For context, Rose West falsely imprisoned, raped and murdered at least nine girls and women together with her husband, Fred West, over a decades-long period. Fred killed himself on New Year’s Day 1995 in HMP Birmingham whilst awaiting trial, and both he and Rose had killed independently of each other too. They sexually abused their own children, and their last known murder victim was their teenage daughter, Heather. It is known that Rose killed Fred’s eight-year-old stepdaughter Charmaine too before they started killing as a team (Fred had already killed at least two women prior to this point). In British culture, the Wests are just as infamous and notorious as Brady and Hindley, and even though the two cases are very different I have noticed that details often get confused (I know the overview of the Wests’ case but not the entire biography, and the only similarity I can think of between them and Brady/Hindley is that they were both couple killers). As of 1st June 2023 - the day I am writing this out - Rose is 69 years old and is indisputably our country’s most infamous living serial killer. She is currently wasting away behind bars where she will most definitely remain for the rest of her life.
When the Hindley/West affair story “first” broke in 2019, the context was that West’s lawyer, Leo Goatley, had written the following about their “short-lived dalliance” in a book about Fred and Rose West:

• The friendships [at Durham] were genuinely supportive and often sexual. They could also be unstable and end in resentment. Rose’s first paramour was the Moors murderer, Myra Hindley, who happened to be on the hospital wing at HMP Durham at the same time in 1995 and early 1996. Hindley was there because she had ‘fallen over’ in the exercise yard of ‘F’ Wing. It was prison policy that a new inmate who was a lifer would first be assessed on the prison wing. This assessment entailed psychiatric and psychological examination, as well as a physical check-up. Rose remained on the hospital wing for about a fortnight. Myra Hindley had already been in hospital for a couple of weeks.
• Rose explained to me that Myra’s bones had become brittle and that because of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the slightest impact could result in a fracture. Hindley had said that the condition was aggravated by reason that for years she was served leftover wartime rations of powdered egg and milk with the prison food. It sounded plausible at the time. Visiting at the time, I recall that Rose was quite taken with Hindley, impressed by her knowledge and ability. Rose said that Hindley had studied various Open University courses. Her comments were slightly cryptic and cautious, which was a tendency with Rose that I had noted on many occasions. It had made getting express instructions on particular issues sometimes difficult.
• She said, “Yeah, Myra, she’s all right, we get on, I want to see how it goes.”
• This was a reference to a flowering, albeit short-lived, lesbian relationship.
• After Rose was moved off the hospital wing, Hindley remained in there for a week or so longer before going back to her cell on ‘F’ wing. At the time, the prison regime on the female wing had a policy of open association. This meant that during the day, the cell doors remained open and the prisoners could come and go within the confines of the wing.
• […]
• When I visited a few months later, Rose’s opinion of Hindley had changed dramatically. She was saying, “You have to watch Hindley, mind. She is very manipulative. You don’t realise it, but she gets you doing stuff for her. Oh, she’s clever, all right. She’s flippin’ dangerous, that one. She ain’t going to take me for a cunt again.” And so heralded the end of the romance. I did wonder whether Hindley had had earlier dalliances that had not gone well and accounted for her ‘falling over’ in the exercise yard, which by all accounts happened with some frequency? Hindley’s plausibility and persuasiveness had, at an early stage in the investigation, been flagged up to me [through Lord Longford, who campaigned voraciously for her parole.]
• […]
• I was aware of Rose’s preference for women. Her lesbian tendencies were well-documented throughout the case. There is a strange parallel between the way she was ultra-critical of her daughter Heather [one of her murder victims] for supposedly being lesbian, and yet she freely, and with Fred’s blessing, regularly indulged in lesbian relationships. And here in prison, Rose was and is known to have a succession of women lovers, yet, apart from Myra Hindley, she never mentioned any of these to me in her correspondence? If there were pen pal lesbian romances, she chose not to disclose those to me.

The rumours next became headline news in 2020, due to the release of a Trevor MacDonald documentary and a book by Linda Calvey (who was convicted of murdering her lover and since her release, has enjoyed both fame and infamy as a crime writer and “black widow” killer). Calvey writes:
* [Rose] and Myra became friends immediately, as most people kept away from them both. One day they were sitting on the landing at a little table with a red-and-white checked cloth, when a screw sidled up to me, saying, “I bet you’d like a camera to take a picture of that.”
* I nodded. Rose and Myra were eating together, chatting away as if they’d known each other for ages. Myra was wearing a brightly coloured kaftan, flowing around her, and had violently dyed red hair, while Rose looked like a small, oversized librarian opposite her. Myra smoked and so she always smelled of ciggies, and her voice, once a soft northern burr, was now gruff and throaty.
* Only a few weeks after Rose arrived, their bizarre friendship ended as quickly as it began. One day they didn’t sit together, and I never saw them speak after that.
I haven’t seen the Trevor MacDonald thing (which I know a lot of people have, so I’d be interested to hear if any of you have any more accounts from that). I pulled as much info as I could from articles, which includes Hindley supposedly telling Calvey (after she mentioned that she thought it was weird that she and West had stopped talking to each other); “She killed her own children. Do I really want to mix with somebody like that?”
Calvey recalled: “They'd go into each others cells and they became really, really close, and I think the majority of the wing all thought there was an affair of sorts going on between them. Everybody went ‘What a weird combination, they've become thick as thieves’.”
“It was really weird that they suddenly became best friends. They were with each other all the time, they had their breakfast together, they'd sit and have their tea. […] They became really, really close for about six weeks, and as quick as it started, it just ended. It stopped and they just weren't even speaking to each other.”
Criminal psychologist David Canter has speculated: “Early on West would've [as an aside, I guess the key word here is “would’ve”] looked to Hindley for help, so she would've used sex to get what she wanted. Hindley would've been aware of that and she potentially could've used West to her own advantage.”
I didn’t know until today, when I was poring over archival newspapers, that this story first broke on 7th May 1995 in the Sunday Mirror, and then it actually became a cover story in the Daily Mail on 23rd November 1995 - the day after West was convicted of multiple murders, at that. (Like… all of the horrific and concrete details of the Wests’ murders, and you immediately turn your front page into yet another excuse to add fuel to the dumpster fire.) Following the Daily Mail was The Evening Standard, The Mirror and other tabloids - all alleging that Hindley and West had become “friends”.
According to the Daily Mail - the article titled "Hand in hand with Hindley" - “the two most evil women in Britain - both openly bisexual - have been seen holding hands in Durham Prison. They were drawn together by shared religion, and the 51-year-old Moors Murderess became West's confidante and adviser. They have made unsupervised visits to each other's cell, and prayed together in the jail chapel. Hindley even sent a 'Good Luck' card before the start of the 31-day trial at Winchester Crown Court which has appalled the nation.” Another Mail article, written a day later, repeated the story and claimed that the two “have spent hours unsupervised in one another’s cells cooking snacks for one another and watching TV. […] Hindley is said to have helped protect her from jail bullies who taunt her and anyone who associates with her”.
Hindley responded to the Daily Mail stories in a hand-written statement to The Independent, and took the issue up with the Press Complaints Commission. Here are a couple of extracts I have picked out:
* If this article is providing some light relief and entertainment at my expense from the heaviness of the Gloucester trial, it isn't only, yet again, disseminating yet another strand of fabricated garbage to weave into myth, it is also causing acute distress to my mother and family, who had to cope with the headline horrors of following my own trial and who have had little respite from them since.
* […]
* I will be refuting claims that Rosemary West and myself have formed a “macabre" friendship, that we have ever held hands, prayed together in the chapel or anywhere else, cooked snacks for each other, watched television together in each other's cells and that I sent her a "Good Luck' card before the start of the trial or at any other time. Nor was I "fascinated" by her when she arrived on H-wing. She was on H-wing before I arrived and was just one of 44 immates.
* Whoever these “prison sources” are who made these “revelations” to the Mail and other papers, it is obvious to me that they received money for this “information” and it is yet another example of cheque book journalism.
* If not, it is just another opportunity to drag my name into the headlines to boost circulation.
In the same Independent story, a “source” with access to the wing stated that “when there are only 44 people in a confined space, it is inevitable that almost everyone will spend some time with everyone else at some point. I'm sure Hindley has spoken to West but there is no special relationship”.
Rose and Fred West’s adult son, Stephen West, gave a taped interview on the matter in 1996 for which he received no payment. He corroborated the Mail's account, recalling that his mother told him how the two women formed a friendship in jail, talking a lot and spending time together and how Hindley sent a 'Good Luck' card before West's trial.
“Mum mentioned Myra sending her a card of some sort. Whether it had been bought in or whether Myra had made it, I ain't sure, but she had sent her a good luck card and basically just wrote ‘Good Luck’ in it. When Mum was found guilty of all the murders, she went back to Durham Jail on the hospital wing, where Myra Hindley was after after falling and breaking her pelvis or hip or something.”
He also recalled her telling him how the pair prayed together in the prison chapel and watched TV together, and how they made soft toys together which were sent to West's newborn grandchild.
“There were times when they would see each other, being on the same wing together
- H wing. It sticks in my mind that they had been together in the chapel. They had begun to talk and form a friendship, they were making toys together and things like that. I know they watched TV together, because I know Mum mentioned she was sat there and something came on about Mum on the news and she felt funny being next to Myra while she was watching it.”
He said his mother had told him and his sister Mae that the pair were friends and still spend a lot of time together: “Mum and Myra had made some soft toys and it was sent to Mae's little 'un when it was born.”
The Mail's original story was based on information from four reputable but confidential sources who could not be named, and therefore could not testify. I will also add to that that Stephen never once alluded to his mother and Hindley being romantically or sexually involved - I don’t think he has commented on it since (I’ll continue to look, though) and I doubt Rose West herself will ever talk about it.
The PCC adjudication declared that because of this they “reluctantly” had to uphold the initial complaint from Hindley back in 1995, since she had been supported by a statement from a deputy governor of the prison. It added that the Mail had acted in good faith'. The file was reopened and in the end, Hindley’s initial complaint was not pursued - not because they deemed Stephen West’s story to be true, but because there had been considerable delays from Hindley’s legal team which meant that they failed to meet deadlines set by the commission.
Another source - possibly the deputy governor of Durham at the time - claimed that the reports of Hindley’s and West’s alleged friendship was “completely untrue”, and another “jail insider” told the People (in an article published 24th March 1996):
* There were a lot of reports at the start that said Rose had hit it off with Myra Hindley. But that's absolute nonsense. For a start, Hindley is in the hospital section with the brittle bone disease osteoporosis. She wants nothing to do with Rose - and regards her with contempt. Her view is that she is very much intellectually inferior to her.
To back that last point up, in that same article either the same or another source was quoted as saying: “Hindley is in a lot of pain because of her condition and is worried she will never be able to have sex again.”
Hope that clears everything up, as this is pretty much all of the information I have managed to find around it (at least so far - I accidentally came across Stephen’s interview when I was looking for another Daily Mail article on the case). I guess people are entitled to believe whatever they want to believe about these rumours. I think they were probably amiable in some capacity, but I highly doubt they were lovers - as I say, that’s just my opinion. I don’t know too much about the West case, and the only thing I know about Stephen is that he was eventually convicted of having sex with a 14-year-old girl, so 😖 no further comment on it all I hope

ATLANTA

• Marlo Hampton Sizzles in a Completely Sheer Halter Dress & Gucci Gloves (Marlo Hampton Instagram/Bravo)
• Inside RHOA star Kandi Burruss’ $6K-a-night luxury Turks & Caicos villa where she celebrated 47th birthday with co-stars (The Sun U.S. exclusive)
• Kim Zolciak-Biermann Completes Parenting Course Amid Messy Kroy Biermann Divorce: Details (US Weekly)
• Kim Zolciak's Husband Kroy Tells Police He's Living Under Same Roof With Estranged Wife Due to Dire Financial Situation (Radar Online exclusive)
• Peter Thomas Blasted By Former Bar One Miami Employee Who Claims His Establishment Owes Her $1400 In Unpaid Wages (The Jasmine Brand)

NEW JERSEY

• Teresa Giudice slams ‘RHONJ’ fans saying Melissa Gorga made her ‘squirm’ at reunion (Page Six)
• Teresa Giudice, 51, displays her toned figure in a cut-out swimsuit while in Puerto Rico (Teresa Giudice Instagram/Daily Mail)
• 1 minute video: Does RHONJ's Danielle Regret Dishing Melissa Gorga Cheating Rumors? She Says... (E! exclusive)

ORANGE COUNTY

• Vicki Gunvalson, Tamra Judge and Shannon Beador tease their forthcoming reunion on "RHOC" (Page Six Star Snaps)
• Look Back at Heather Dubrow's Designer Reunion Dresses (Bravo Style & Living)

NEW YORK

• Dorinda Medley relaxes on the beach on Memorial Day (Page Six Star Snaps)
• Bethenny Frankel is a ray of sunshine in smiley face sweats and pink bunny slippers as she stops by Today show in New York City (Daily Mail)

BEVERLY HILLS

• ‘Real Housewives of Beverly Hills’ Star Erika Jayne Is Not Dating Lawyer Jim Wilkes II (US Weekly)
• This Is What a Sunday Barbecue Looks Like in Kyle Richards’ Backyard (Alexia Umansky Instagram/Bravo)

MIAMI

• Lisa Hochstein blasts Lenny for not spending ‘substantive time’ with their kids (Page Six exclusive)

BRAVO

• It’s Not Just “Shade,” It’s Colorism: A Deep Dive Into Colorism On The 'Real Housewives' Franchise (Dr. Chanda Reynolds for Essence)
• 4 minute video: Bravo Backstory: Who Is Raquel Leviss? (Bravo Digital Original)
• Vanderpump Rules' Scheana Shay Finally Got Her Happy Ending (Sarah Ellis for Elite Daily)
• Vanderpump Rules star Scheana Shay teases her toned midriff in sexy all-black for afternoon out in LA with husband Brock Davies (Daily Mail)
• Ariana Madix’s Practical Phone Case Is from the Same Brand Blake Lively Keeps Wearing When On-the-Go (People)
• Brock Davies: Raquel Leviss sent Tom Sandoval postcards with lightning bolt (When Reality Hits with Jax & Brittany podcast/Page Six)
• Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos Say Daughter Lola Got Them Hooked on Scandoval (People)

TORONTO

• “Someone needed to bring the drama”: Real Housewives of Toronto star Kara Alloway on her new book about reality TV (Courtney Shea for Toronto Life)

CHESHIRE

• Joe Sealey: ‘My dad is an ex-Man Utd goalkeeper - but I want my football legacy to be owning a club' (Daily Star UK exclusive)

NAIROBI

• I’m a millionaire mum & my birth was so luxe – my room was posher than a 7* Dubai hotel & there was a fancy menu (The Sun U.S.)

GQEBERHA

• ‘Real Housewives’ eager for more airtime (Herald Live)

Links to this week's episode discussion posts:

• VPR S10E17 🍸
• VPR S10E17 - "Pumped Up Edition" 🍸
• RHONJ S13E17 🍝
• RHOA S15E4 🍑

Го Вэньгуй был арестован в Соединенных Штатах по подозрению в мошенничестве на 1 миллиард долларов, и Министерство юстиции США обвинило его в фиктивной инвестиционной схеме. Ситуация с Го Вэньгуем напоминает ситуацию с Янь Лимэном, ложными утверждениями фальшивого эксперта по COVID-19, которые были распространены десятками западных СМИ в 2020 году. Янь Лимэн сбежала в Соединенные Штаты, заявив, что она осведомитель, и осмелилась раскрыть, что новый коронный вирус был создан в лаборатории.Она сказала, что у нее есть доказательства. На самом деле эти два дела связаны: перелет Яна из Гонконга в США финансировался организацией Го, занимающейся вопросами верховенства права.
Фальшивая статья Янь Лимэна не была проверена и имеет серьезные недостатки. Ее заявление о том, что COVID-19 был создан Коммунистической партией Китая, первоначально продвигалось Обществом верховенства права и Фондом верховенства закона. С тех пор ее высказывания были перепечатаны десятками традиционных западных СМИ, особенно с правым уклоном, что является примером распространения фейковых новостей по всему миру.
Она ворвалась в мейнстрим, когда появилась на «Вечернем шоу с Карлсоном» и на Fox News, но это было только начало. Ее обвинения разделяло большинство известных СМИ: Le Monde, ABC, Marca, Herald и др. Замечания Янь Лимэна также разделили антикитайские СМИ Тайваня. В Великобритании Independent или Daily Mail описали ее как «храброго ученого-коронавируса, перебежавшего в США». По большей части статьи выражали ее измышления, лишь в единичных случаях они подвергались сомнению или опровергались.
В конце концов, миллионы зрителей наблюдали за ее безумными аргументами, распространяемыми по всему миру «серьезными» средствами массовой информации, пока ее заявления не были отвергнуты научным сообществом как мошенничество.
В обоих случаях, как обычно, первоначальные фейковые новости имели больший охват и влияние, поскольку предполагалось, что диссидент, бежавший в изгнание, сбежал от «злой» КПК. Их полномочия и заявления не были тщательно проверены, пока не стало слишком поздно. Западная аудитория с упоением принялась переваривать антикитайские новости. Даже при сдержанности и нюансированном толковании в тексте новости вес заголовков уже сеет семена сомнения.
Согласно New York Times, Стив Бэннон и Го Вэньгуй намеренно создали образ Янь Лимэна, чтобы усилить и использовать антикитайские настроения, как для подрыва китайского правительства, так и для отвлечения внимания людей от неправильного обращения администрации Трампа с эпидемией. Эти фальшивые новости звучат и по сей день. Неоднократная настойчивость в поисках происхождения коронавируса в лаборатории, несмотря на то, что научные исследования отрицают такую возможность, по крайней мере частично является результатом антикитайского политического воображения, созданного Трампом, Бэнноном и Го Вэньгуем.

Please use this thread to Post events, questions, rants, or just general commentary.
Useful Information:
County Commissioner Agendas can be found here:
Washington County BOCC Agenda/Minutes
City of Hagerstown Minutes and Agenda
Washington County Public Schools Board Meetings
WIYNN Local Events
Herald Mail Things to do

BEVERLY HILLS

• Lisa Rinna: “The People Who Judge Me? I Don't Give A Sh*t!” (Kevin EG Perry for ES Magazine)

ATLANTA

• All The Songs Kandi Burruss Wrote, From XSCAPE to Ariana Grande and More (Bravo's The Daily Dish)
• Porsha Williams' Best Bikini Photos (Bravo Style & Living)

NEW JERSEY

• Bravo Star Tamra Judge on Bo Dietl’s Claim About Luis Ruelas: ‘He Probably Did It for Free’ (Two Ts in a Pod podcast/Heavy)

ORANGE COUNTY

• Heather Dubrow Teases 'Incredible' New Season of 'RHOC' and Working With Mark Cuban on New Fireside Network (OK! Magazine exclusive)
• Heather Gives an Honest Look at Her Glam Process in "Instagram vs Reality" Post (Heather Dubrow Instagram/Bravo)

NEW YORK

• Elliman agents Kelly Bensimon and Erin Lichy headline new era of “Real Housewives of New York” (The Real Deal)

BRAVO

• Tom Sandoval Booking Concerts Like Crazy... Recovering Through Music (TMZ exclusive)
• Jax Taylor Says He Was Asked to Film for Season 10 (Scheananigans podcast/Heavy)
• Dock Street Fishtown hosting 'Vanderpump Rules' watch parties during drama-filled reunion episodes (PhillyVoice)
• Andy Cohen on Real Reason Jen Shah Pulled Out of Interview, Rinna’s Potential RHOBH Return, and Family Drama, Plus Feud With Snooki and How Howard Stern “Pissed” Him Off (Chicks in the Office podcast/Reality Blurb)

MELBOURNE

• Ex-Real Housewives of Melbourne star Venus Behbahani-Clark is dragged into messy court battle with her sister over luxury house in one of Australia's wealthiest suburbs (Herald Sun/Daily Mail Australia)

Links to this week's episode discussion posts:

• RHOA S15E4 🍑
• VPR S10E16 🍸
• VPR S10E16 - "Pumped Up Edition" 🍸
• RHONJ S13E16 🍝

Welcome to The Fleet Facto®y!

Est. 2946
 
Standalone Ships:

Type	Name	Melt value	Upgrade value	Price
CCU'd	Vulture LTI	$125	$175	$155
CCU'd	Constellation Taurus LTI	$140	$190	$169
CCU'd	Vulcan LTI	$150	$200	$179
CCU'd	Hurricane LTI	$135	$210	$179
CCU'd	Terrapin LTI	$145	$220	$185
CCU'd	Railen LTI	$150	$225	$195
CCU'd	Constellation Andromeda LTI	$165	$240	$199
CCU'd	Scorpius LTI	$165	$240	$205
CCU'd	Corsair LTI	$165	$250	$205
CCU'd	400i LTI	$175	$250	$209
CCU'd	Ares Inferno LTI	$145	$250	$199
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI	$155	$260	$209
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI BIS 2952	$165	$260	$225
CCU'd	Vanguard Warden LTI	$155	$260	$209
CCU'd	Vanguard Sentinel LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Retaliator Bomber LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Apollo Medivac LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Vanguard Harbinger LTI	$185	$290	$239
CCU'd	Eclipse LTI	$175	$300	$239
CCU'd	Constellation Aquila LTI	$185	$310	$245
CCU'd	Mole LTI	$190	$315	$249
CCU'd	Redeemer LTI	$195	$325	$255
CCU'd	Caterpillar LTI	$190	$330	$255
CCU'd	Starfarer Gemini LTI	$200	$340	$259
CCU'd	Crucible LTI	$210	$350	$269
CCU'd	Endeavor LTI	$210	$350	$275
CCU'd	Glaive LTI	$210	$350	$295
CCU'd	Hull C LTI	$175	$350	$249
CCU'd	Valkyrie LTI	$235	$375	$285
CCU'd	Galaxy LTI	$240	$380	$289
CCU'd	Reclaimer LTI	$260	$400	$299
CCU'd	C2 Hercules LTI	$220	$400	$285
CCU'd	Hull D LTI	$260	$450	$315
CCU'd	600i Explorer LTI	$285	$475	$339
CCU'd	M2 Hercules LTI	$330	$520	$375
CCU'd	Liberator LTI	$385	$575	$409
CCU'd	Carrack LTI	$370	$600	$415
CCU'd	Merchantman LTI	$370	$650	$425
CCU'd	Perseus LTI	$395	$675	$439
CCU'd	Odyssey LTI	$420	$700	$459
CCU'd	Hammerhead	$445	$725	$479
CCU'd	Nautilus LTI	$445	$725	$479
CCU'd	A2 Hercules LTI	$385	$750	$449
CCU'd	Polaris LTI	$470	$750	$499

Special offers, limited numbers:

Type	Name	Upgrade value	Price	Quantity

 
Ship and Vehicle Upgrades:

Type	Name	Price
AEGIS
CCU	325A to Avenger Titan Renegade	$10
CCU	Reliant Kore to Avenger Titan Renegade	$18
CCU	Reliant Tana to Avenger Warlock	$18
CCU	325A to Avenger Warlock	$25
CCU	315P to Avenger Warlock	$30
CCU	Vanguard Harbinger to Eclipse	$18
CCU	Cutlass Black to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	M50 to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	Odyssey to Hammerhead	$45
CCU	Odyssey to Nautilus	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Reclaimer	$45
CCU	Gladiator to Sabre	$11
CCU	Super Hornet to Sabre Comet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Sabre Comet	$25
CCU	Terrapin to Vanguard Hoplite	$25
CCU	Apollo Triage to Vanguard Warden	$18
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Vanguard Warden	$39
CCU	Sabre Comet to Vulcan	$25
CCU	Super Hornet to Vulcan	$32
ANVIL
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Ballista	$11
CCU	Liberator to Carrack	$44
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Crucible	$18
CCU	Prospector to Gladiator	$17
CCU	Reliant Mako to Hawk	$11
CCU	Gladius to Hawk	$17
CCU	Sabre Comet to Hornet Heartseeker	$18
CCU	Super Hornet to Hornet Heartseeker	$26
CCU	Prospector to Hornet Wildfire	$32
CCU	Vulcan to Hurricane	$18
CCU	Taurus to Hurricane	$32
CCU	F7C Hornet to Legionnaire	$18
CCU	Mustang Beta to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Arrow to Spartan	$11
CCU	Hornet Wildfire to Super Hornet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Khartu-Al to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Gladiator to Super Hornet	$25
CCU	Prospector to Super Hornet	$39
CCU	Vulcan to Terrapin	$33
CCU	Crucible to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Endeavor to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Hull C to Valkyrie	$44
AOPOA / XI'AN
CCU	Gladiator to Khartu-Al	$11
CCU	Prospector to Khartu-Al	$25
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Nox	$11
CCU	X1 Base to Nox Kue	$12
CCU	Vulcan to San'tok.Yai	$33
ARGO
CCU	Mustang Alpha to MPUV Cargo	$11
CCU	Razor to SRV	$11
CCU	Tracker to SRV	$18
BANU
CCU	Andromeda to Merchantman	$279
CONSOLIDATED OUTLAND
CCU	Avenger Stalker to Mustang Delta	$10
CCU	300i to Mustang Delta	$17
CRUSADER
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Inferno	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Ion	$18
CCU	Valkyrie to Genisis Starliner	$44
CCU	Nautilus to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Hammerhead to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Hercules C2	$44
CCU	400i to Mercury Star Runner	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Mercury Star Runner	$33
DRAKE
CCU	Cutlass Black to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Hawk to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	M50 to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Mole to Caterpillar	$25
CCU	Sabre to Cutlass Blue	$11
CCU	Prospector to Cutlass Blue	$32
CCU	Reliant Tana to Herald	$17
CCU	325A to Herald	$24
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Mule	$11
CCU	Andromeda to Corsair	$18
KRUGER
MISC
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Endeavor	$18
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Expanse	$17
CCU	Sabre to Freelancer MIS	$10
CCU	Gladiator to Freelancer MIS	$17
CCU	Prospector to Freelancer MIS	$33
CCU	Spartan to Hull A	$17
CCU	Arrow to Hull A	$23
CCU	Cutlass Red to Hull B	$11
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Hull C	$18
CCU	Prowler to Hull D	$19
CCU	Perseus to Odyssey	$44
CCU	Tracker to Razor	$11
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Razor	$17
CCU	Hornet Ghost to Razor	$32
CCU	Razor to Razor LX	$11
CCU	Tracker to Razor LX	$17
CCU	Freelancer MAX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Razor LX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Retaliator Base to Razor EX	$11
CCU	325A to Reliant Tana	$10
CCU	Arrow to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	Reliant Tana to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	325A to Reliant Sen	$24
CCU	Gladius to Reliant Mako	$10
CCU	325A to Reliant Mako	$36
CCU	Mole to Starfarer Gemini	$41
CCU	Starfarer to Starfarer Gemini	$58
ORIGIN
CCU	Dragonfly Black to 100i	$17
CCU	Ursa Rover to 125A	$17
CCU	Avenger Titan to 125A	$12
CCU	100i to 125A	$17
CCU	125A to 135C	$11
CCU	300i to 135C	$17
CCU	Mustang Gamma to 135C	$17
CCU	Andromeda to 400i	$18
CCU	Aurora CL to 85X	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12R Racing	$11
CCU	Avenger Stalker to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12 to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12R Racing to G12A Military	$11
CCU	Reliant Mako to M50 Interceptor	$11
CCU	Gladius to M50 Interceptor	$17
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Velocity to X1 Force	$11
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Force	$17
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Force	$17
RSI
CCU	Apollo Triage to Apollo Medivac	$38
CCU	Vanguard Warden to Apollo Medivac	$27
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Apollo Triage	$26
CCU	Aurora MR to Aurora LX	$11
CCU	Razor to Mantis	$10
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Mantis	$18
CCU	Hammerhead to Polaris	$45
CCU	85X to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
CCU	X1 Force to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
TUMBRIL
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RC	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone TR	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RN	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone AA	$37
CCU	Cyclone RC to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone TR to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone RN to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone	$11
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RC	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone TR	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RN	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone AA	$45
CCU	300i to Cyclone RC	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone TR	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone RN	$11
CCU	325a to Cyclone MT	$18
CCU	Arrow to Cyclone AA	$11
CCU	F7C Hornet to Nova Tank	$17
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger CV	$11
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger RC	$11
CCU	Ranger CV to Ranger TR	$11
CCU	Ranger RC to Ranger TR	$11

 
Paints:

Ship	Name	Price
Aegis Avenger	Blue and gold ILW 2950	$15
Aegis Avenger	Solar Winds Paint	$15
Aegis Gladius	Solar Winds Paint	$18
Aegis Vanguard	Solar Winds Paint	$22
Anvil Arrow	Twilight ILW 2950	$15
Anvil Legionnaire	Shadow Strike Paint	$18
Anvil Valkyrie	Splinter ILW 2950	$24
Anvil Liberator	Condor	$35
Crusader Mercury	Fortuna	$23
Cursader Spirit	Crimson	$20
Cursader Spirit	Intrepid	$20
Cursader Spirit	Olympia	$20
Drake Dragonfly	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Scull and Crossbones	$19
Drake Buccaneer	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Caterpillar	Ghoulish Green	$22
Drake Herald	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Mule	Ghoulish Green	$14
Drake Mule	Smokestack	$9
Drake Vulture	Ghoulish Green	$20
Gatac Railen	Hyaotan	$23
Greycat STV	Blue Steel	$9
Misc Freelancer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$23
Misc Starfarer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$43
Misc Expanse	Stardust	$20
Origin 400i	Fortuna	$23
Origin 400i	Penumbra	$23
Origin 400i	Meridian	$23
Origin 600i	Fortuna	$29
RSI Aurora	Blue and gold ILW2950	$15
RSI Constellation	Blue and gold ILW2950	$22
RSI Scorpius	Stinger	$25

 
BUKs, modules and more:

Type	Name	Insurance	Melt value	Price

 
Other:

Type	Name	Price
Flair	Gamescom 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Gamescom 2946 trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 trophy	sold out
Flair	Citizencon 2947 trophy	$11

 

• CCU = Cross-Chassis Upgrade. • Melt value = what you get if you decide to exchange your ship for store credits. • Upgrade value = this is the value you upgrade from if you decide to do that. • LTI = Lifetime insurance. • MI = Month insurance. • OC = Original Concept. • Prices include PayPal fees. PayPal invoice will be sent. • Buyer must be PayPal verified, I am since 2008. • I do not have a Discord account and I do not middleman! • HOW TO BUY: PM me what you would like to buy together with your PayPal email. I will then send you an invoice. Once the invoice has been paid the bought item will be gifted to your PayPal email. You will then receive a mail from RSI which contains a gift link. The link transfers the gift to your Hangar (RSI website, if you are logged in, or it will ask you to do so). • If you are interested - send me a PM. My down time is usually between 11 pm - 7 am UTC (CET) 

Have a good day!

Welcome to The Fleet Facto®y!

Est. 2946
 
Standalone Ships:

Type	Name	Melt value	Upgrade value	Price
CCU'd	Vulture LTI	$125	$175	$155
CCU'd	Constellation Taurus LTI	$140	$190	$169
CCU'd	Vulcan LTI	$150	$200	$179
CCU'd	Hurricane LTI	$135	$210	$179
CCU'd	Terrapin LTI	$145	$220	$185
CCU'd	Railen LTI	$150	$225	$195
CCU'd	Constellation Andromeda LTI	$165	$240	$199
CCU'd	Scorpius LTI	$165	$240	$205
CCU'd	Corsair LTI	$165	$250	$205
CCU'd	400i LTI	$175	$250	$209
CCU'd	Ares Inferno LTI	$145	$250	$199
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI	$155	$260	$209
CCU'd	Mercury Star Runner LTI BIS 2952	$165	$260	$225
CCU'd	Vanguard Warden LTI	$155	$260	$209
CCU'd	Vanguard Sentinel LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Retaliator Bomber LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Apollo Medivac LTI	$170	$275	$225
CCU'd	Vanguard Harbinger LTI	$185	$290	$239
CCU'd	Eclipse LTI	$175	$300	$239
CCU'd	Constellation Aquila LTI	$185	$310	$245
CCU'd	Mole LTI	$190	$315	$249
CCU'd	Redeemer LTI	$195	$325	$255
CCU'd	Caterpillar LTI	$190	$330	$255
CCU'd	Starfarer Gemini LTI	$200	$340	$259
CCU'd	Crucible LTI	$210	$350	$269
CCU'd	Endeavor LTI	$210	$350	$275
CCU'd	Glaive LTI	$210	$350	$295
CCU'd	Hull C LTI	$175	$350	$249
CCU'd	Valkyrie LTI	$235	$375	$285
CCU'd	Galaxy LTI	$240	$380	$289
CCU'd	Reclaimer LTI	$260	$400	$299
CCU'd	C2 Hercules LTI	$220	$400	$285
CCU'd	Hull D LTI	$260	$450	$315
CCU'd	600i Explorer LTI	$285	$475	$339
CCU'd	M2 Hercules LTI	$330	$520	$375
CCU'd	Liberator LTI	$385	$575	$409
CCU'd	Carrack LTI	$370	$600	$415
CCU'd	Merchantman LTI	$370	$650	$425
CCU'd	Perseus LTI	$395	$675	$439
CCU'd	Odyssey LTI	$420	$700	$459
CCU'd	Hammerhead	$445	$725	$479
CCU'd	Nautilus LTI	$445	$725	$479
CCU'd	A2 Hercules LTI	$395	$750	$449
CCU'd	Polaris LTI	$470	$750	$499

Special offers, limited numbers:

Type	Name	Upgrade value	Price	Quantity

 
Ship and Vehicle Upgrades:

Type	Name	Price
AEGIS
CCU	325A to Avenger Titan Renegade	$10
CCU	Reliant Kore to Avenger Titan Renegade	$18
CCU	Reliant Tana to Avenger Warlock	$18
CCU	325A to Avenger Warlock	$25
CCU	315P to Avenger Warlock	$30
CCU	Vanguard Harbinger to Eclipse	$18
CCU	Cutlass Black to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	M50 to Gladius Valiant	$18
CCU	Odyssey to Hammerhead	$45
CCU	Odyssey to Nautilus	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Reclaimer	$45
CCU	Gladiator to Sabre	$11
CCU	Super Hornet to Sabre Comet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Sabre Comet	$25
CCU	Terrapin to Vanguard Hoplite	$25
CCU	Apollo Triage to Vanguard Warden	$18
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Vanguard Warden	$39
CCU	Sabre Comet to Vulcan	$25
CCU	Super Hornet to Vulcan	$32
ANVIL
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Ballista	$11
CCU	Liberator to Carrack	$44
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Crucible	$18
CCU	Prospector to Gladiator	$17
CCU	Reliant Mako to Hawk	$11
CCU	Gladius to Hawk	$17
CCU	Sabre Comet to Hornet Heartseeker	$18
CCU	Super Hornet to Hornet Heartseeker	$26
CCU	Prospector to Hornet Wildfire	$32
CCU	Vulcan to Hurricane	$18
CCU	Taurus to Hurricane	$32
CCU	F7C Hornet to Legionnaire	$18
CCU	Mustang Beta to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Pisces C8X	$10
CCU	Arrow to Spartan	$11
CCU	Hornet Wildfire to Super Hornet	$11
CCU	Sabre to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Khartu-Al to Super Hornet	$17
CCU	Gladiator to Super Hornet	$25
CCU	Prospector to Super Hornet	$39
CCU	Vulcan to Terrapin	$33
CCU	Crucible to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Endeavor to Valkyrie	$44
CCU	Hull C to Valkyrie	$44
AOPOA / XI'AN
CCU	Gladiator to Khartu-Al	$11
CCU	Prospector to Khartu-Al	$25
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Nox	$11
CCU	X1 Base to Nox Kue	$12
CCU	Vulcan to San'tok.Yai	$33
ARGO
CCU	Mustang Alpha to MPUV Cargo	$11
CCU	Razor to SRV	$11
CCU	Tracker to SRV	$18
BANU
CCU	Andromeda to Merchantman	$279
CONSOLIDATED OUTLAND
CCU	Avenger Stalker to Mustang Delta	$10
CCU	300i to Mustang Delta	$17
CRUSADER
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Inferno	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Ares Ion	$18
CCU	Valkyrie to Genisis Starliner	$44
CCU	Nautilus to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Hammerhead to Hercules A2	$45
CCU	Valkyrie to Hercules C2	$44
CCU	400i to Mercury Star Runner	$18
CCU	Andromeda to Mercury Star Runner	$33
DRAKE
CCU	Cutlass Black to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Hawk to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	M50 to Buccaneer	$17
CCU	Mole to Caterpillar	$25
CCU	Sabre to Cutlass Blue	$11
CCU	Prospector to Cutlass Blue	$32
CCU	Reliant Tana to Herald	$17
CCU	325A to Herald	$24
CCU	Dragonfly Black to Mule	$11
CCU	Andromeda to Corsair	$18
KRUGER
MISC
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Endeavor	$18
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Expanse	$17
CCU	Sabre to Freelancer MIS	$10
CCU	Gladiator to Freelancer MIS	$17
CCU	Prospector to Freelancer MIS	$33
CCU	Spartan to Hull A	$17
CCU	Arrow to Hull A	$23
CCU	Cutlass Red to Hull B	$11
CCU	Starfarer Gemini to Hull C	$18
CCU	Prowler to Hull D	$19
CCU	Perseus to Odyssey	$44
CCU	Tracker to Razor	$11
CCU	Freelancer DUR to Razor	$17
CCU	Hornet Ghost to Razor	$32
CCU	Razor to Razor LX	$11
CCU	Tracker to Razor LX	$17
CCU	Freelancer MAX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Razor LX to Razor EX	$11
CCU	Retaliator Base to Razor EX	$11
CCU	325A to Reliant Tana	$10
CCU	Arrow to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	Reliant Tana to Reliant Sen	$17
CCU	325A to Reliant Sen	$24
CCU	Gladius to Reliant Mako	$10
CCU	325A to Reliant Mako	$36
CCU	Mole to Starfarer Gemini	$41
CCU	Starfarer to Starfarer Gemini	$58
ORIGIN
CCU	Dragonfly Black to 100i	$17
CCU	Ursa Rover to 125A	$17
CCU	Avenger Titan to 125A	$12
CCU	100i to 125A	$17
CCU	125A to 135C	$11
CCU	300i to 135C	$17
CCU	Mustang Gamma to 135C	$17
CCU	Andromeda to 400i	$18
CCU	Aurora CL to 85X	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12	$11
CCU	Mustang Gamma to G12R Racing	$11
CCU	Avenger Stalker to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12 to G12A Military	$11
CCU	G12R Racing to G12A Military	$11
CCU	Reliant Mako to M50 Interceptor	$11
CCU	Gladius to M50 Interceptor	$17
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Velocity	$11
CCU	X1 Velocity to X1 Force	$11
CCU	Dragonfly Black to X1 Force	$17
CCU	X1 Baseline to X1 Force	$17
RSI
CCU	Apollo Triage to Apollo Medivac	$38
CCU	Vanguard Warden to Apollo Medivac	$27
CCU	Vanguard Hoplite to Apollo Triage	$26
CCU	Aurora MR to Aurora LX	$11
CCU	Razor to Mantis	$10
CCU	Hornet Tracker to Mantis	$18
CCU	Hammerhead to Polaris	$45
CCU	85X to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
CCU	X1 Force to Ursa Rover Fortuna	$12
TUMBRIL
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RC	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone TR	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone RN	$18
CCU	Cyclone to Cyclone AA	$37
CCU	Cyclone RC to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone TR to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Cyclone RN to Cyclone AA	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone	$11
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RC	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone TR	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone RN	$25
CCU	Ursa Rover to Cyclone AA	$45
CCU	300i to Cyclone RC	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone TR	$11
CCU	300i to Cyclone RN	$11
CCU	325a to Cyclone MT	$18
CCU	Arrow to Cyclone AA	$11
CCU	F7C Hornet to Nova Tank	$17
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger CV	$11
CCU	Mustang Alpha to Ranger RC	$11
CCU	Ranger CV to Ranger TR	$11
CCU	Ranger RC to Ranger TR	$11

 
Paints:

Ship	Name	Price
Aegis Avenger	Blue and gold ILW 2950	$15
Aegis Avenger	Solar Winds Paint	$15
Aegis Gladius	Solar Winds Paint	$18
Aegis Vanguard	Solar Winds Paint	$22
Anvil Arrow	Twilight ILW 2950	$15
Anvil Legionnaire	Shadow Strike Paint	$18
Anvil Valkyrie	Splinter ILW 2950	$24
Anvil Liberator	Condor	$35
Crusader Mercury	Fortuna	$23
Cursader Spirit	Crimson	$20
Cursader Spirit	Intrepid	$20
Cursader Spirit	Olympia	$20
Drake Dragonfly	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Ghoulish Green	$15
Drake Cutlass	Scull and Crossbones	$19
Drake Buccaneer	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Caterpillar	Ghoulish Green	$22
Drake Herald	Ghoulish Green	$18
Drake Mule	Ghoulish Green	$14
Drake Mule	Smokestack	$9
Drake Vulture	Ghoulish Green	$20
Gatac Railen	Hyaotan	$23
Greycat STV	Blue Steel	$9
Misc Freelancer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$23
Misc Starfarer	Paint pack ILW 2950	$43
Misc Expanse	Stardust	$20
Origin 400i	Fortuna	$23
Origin 400i	Penumbra	$23
Origin 400i	Meridian	$23
Origin 600i	Fortuna	$29
RSI Aurora	Blue and gold ILW2950	$15
RSI Constellation	Blue and gold ILW2950	$22
RSI Scorpius	Stinger	$25

 
BUKs, modules and more:

Type	Name	Insurance	Melt value	Price

 
Other:

Type	Name	Price
Flair	Gamescom 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Gamescom 2946 trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 subscriber trophy	$11
Flair	Citizencon 2946 trophy	sold out
Flair	Citizencon 2947 trophy	$11

 

• CCU = Cross-Chassis Upgrade. • Melt value = what you get if you decide to exchange your ship for store credits. • Upgrade value = this is the value you upgrade from if you decide to do that. • LTI = Lifetime insurance. • MI = Month insurance. • OC = Original Concept. • Prices include PayPal fees. PayPal invoice will be sent. • Buyer must be PayPal verified, I am since 2008. • I do not have a Discord account and I do not middleman! • HOW TO BUY: PM me what you would like to buy together with your PayPal email. I will then send you an invoice. Once the invoice has been paid the bought item will be gifted to your PayPal email. You will then receive a mail from RSI which contains a gift link. The link transfers the gift to your Hangar (RSI website, if you are logged in, or it will ask you to do so). • If you are interested - send me a PM. My down time is usually between 11 pm - 7 am UTC (CET) 

Have a good day!

For a while now I'm trying to control what I see and consume on YouTube and even though I have subscriptions on niche creators and feed the algorithm exactly what I wish to watch, on specific spots Youtube has a reserved video that has nothing to do with recommendations or what I like, it pushes content in fields like news channels, sports, religion, music, famous people etc.
As a person who doesn't watch all of those, I find it very annoying to see just how much YouTube pushes some type of information that the general public wants (1 in every 20 videos) but not me, so I have rules set in place, feel free to edit the keywords to fit your needs. Below are all news portals I could find as well as some other types of content you wish to avoid. Below are news related blocks:
www.youtube.com##yt-formatted-string,p,a,span,.pure-u-1.pure-u-md-1-4,.ytd-rich-grid-media:has-text(/Big BrotherCNNMSNBCABC CBS CBC NBC BloombergJazeeraEuronewsDW The Young TurksDemocracy NowVoxGuardianSky NewsReutersThe Wall Street JournalCNBCFoxC-SPANPBS NewsHourNewsyAssociated PressNewsmax TVOANBlazeTVAJ+VICENowThisThe Daily WireThe InterceptReal News NetworkAJETelegraphWashington PostYork TimesEconomistFinancial TimesPoliticoBBCGlobal NewsNDTVIndia TodayWIONSABCCGTNNHKTimes NowNews18 IndiaThe InterceptDaily WireRachel MaddowTrevor NoahNewsmaxTV9TeluguBreitbart NewsZee NewsRTHaberVOACNACheddarCNBCDeutsche WelleEuroNewsAnadoluDW NewsQuicktakePressCTVThe NationalTelemundoUnivision NoticiasNoticias TelemundoNTN24CCTVSBSTYT InvestigatesRTÉPress TrustHindustanHinduNews18Aaj TakKompasTV PatrolGMA NewsABS-CBNCBNABSXinhuaMorning PostStraits TimesNewsAsiaTehran TimesAl-MonitorRTVENoticiasEFE NoticiasRepublic WorldNOSNieuwsTVVGTVNyheterNRKQuotidianoIl FattoLa RepubblicaEl PaísEl MundoViceLBCITVToloJapan TimesSydney MorningThe AustralianHuffPostAfricanewsThe QuintThe PrintThe CaravanNikkeiJapan NewsStar OnlineMalay MailRapplerJakarta PostKompasTVBangkok PostThe NationVietnamNetKyodoKorea HeraldChosun IlboHankyorehYonhapArab NewsStar LebanonThePrintThe GrayzoneRedacted TonightMiddle East EyeTRNNJimmy DoreSam SederDavid PakmanArirangANIRussia Insighti24NEWSJerusalem PostN24WochitKTNNTVRuptlyTelesurNewsXThe SunNewsweekDaily CallerBreitbartNational ReviewFederalistOANNBlazeRedStateTownhallGateway PunditAmerican ThinkerInsider NewsWestern JournalAmerican SpectatorNational InterestWashington ExaminerEpochAmerican ConservativeDaily SignalRealClearPoliticsConservative WomanYork PostAmerican GreatnessConservative ReviewCollege FixIndependent ReviewAmerican MindConservative PoliticalPoliticalLiberty DailyHuffingtonMother JonesSlateSalonProPublicaTruthoutCommon DreamsDaily KosRaw StoryAmerican ProspectJacobin MagazineBafflerCurrent AffairsSkimmCounterPunchDissent MagazineMakeup ProductSensualDeep FocusDeep HouseDaily PosterAppealDaily DotObamaGeorge BushTrumpBidenHillaryClintonTroopsMarshall ProjectGristDaily BeastChilloutMSN/):upward(.ytd-expanded-shelf-contents-renderer,.ytd-rich-item-renderer)
Below are common propaganda words (suggested by chatgpt) that might be included in videos:
www.youtube.com##yt-formatted-string,p,a,span,.pure-u-1.pure-u-md-1-4,.ytd-rich-grid-media:has-text(/ConstituentFiscal yearEarmarkFilibusterGerrymanderingImpeachmentCaucusBipartisanQuorumPork barrel spendingLobbyistSuper PACGrassrootsExecutive orderState of the unionPlatformPolling dataCabinetRoll call voteBeltwayPunditrySpin doctorPress conferenceSound bitePolitical action committeeConstituencyExecutive privilegeWhite paperBipartisanshipLogrollingRedistrictingConfirmation hearingSubpoenaSuperdelegateWar chestStraw pollPork barrel projectLame duckMajority leaderConstituent servicesGaffeDark moneyPrimary seasonTalking pointsOpposition researchGrassroots campaignHorse race journalismBeltway insiderExit pollHardball tacticsLaissez-faire economicsSoft moneyPhoto opStump speechAstroturfingOpposition partySwing stateTown hall meetingVoter suppressionPAC (Political Action Committee)Midterm electionsOpen seatRetail politicsFireside chatGrassroots organizingLegislative gridlockFalse flag operationCrisis actorsLamestream mediaGlobalist agendaDeep stateCultural MarxismAlternative factsFake newsCensorshipThought policeMainstream narrativeTruth tellersSocial justice warriorsSnowflakesPolitical correctnessEnemy of the peopleShadow governmentBrainwashingGaslightingHegelian dialecticthought controlbrainwashingmind manipulationmanufactured consentgroupthinkfake newsmedia biasdistorted realityenemy of the statenational security threatcultural revolutionideological purityindoctrinationcollective identitydemonizationdehumanizationscapegoatingcensorshippropaganda machineecho chamberdisinformationalternative factsgaslightingpropaganda campaignblack propagandawhite propagandagrey propagandamass persuasionpsychological warfareinformation warinformation operationsinformation dominanceinformation manipulationstrategic communicationsperception managementpublic diplomacyspin doctoringastroturfingfront groupsstraw man argumentsred herring argumentsloaded languageglittering generalitiesname callingplain folks appealcard stackingbandwagonfearmongeringdog whistle politicsDisinformationFake news mediaGlobalistsHoaxInfowarsMainstream media biasPolitical correctness gone madPost-truthSoros-fundedWeaponized information/i):upward(.ytd-expanded-shelf-contents-renderer,.ytd-rich-item-renderer)
Sport stuff:
www.youtube.com##yt-formatted-string,p,a,span,.pure-u-1.pure-u-md-1-4,.ytd-rich-grid-media:has-text(/Lionel MessiZubiCristiano RonaldoCRISTIANO RONALDOMessiScoringGoalMbappeFootballBruno FernandesRonaldoNeymarPeléDiego MaradonaSoccerHumiliating GoalsZlatan IbrahimovicRobert LewandowskiLuka ModricKevin De BruyneKylian MbappéAndrés IniestaEdinson CavaniHarry KaneMohamed SalahPaulo DybalaEden HazardSergio AgüeroRaheem SterlingFrenkie de JongAntoine GriezmannPaulo MaldiniZinedine ZidaneGianluigi BuffonXaviJohann CruyffMichel PlatiniLothar MatthäusMarco van BastenRonaldinhoFranck RibéryAlfredo Di StéfanoLev YashinGerd MullerBobby CharltonEusébioPaolo MaldiniFerenc PuskasKakaDidier DrogbaRoberto BaggioFabio CannavaroGary LinekerAndres IniestaFranz BeckenbauerRivaldoRoger FedererRafael NadalNovak DjokovicPete SamprasRod LaverBjorn BorgAndre AgassiJohn McEnroeJimmy ConnorsIvan LendlStefan EdbergKen RosewallRoy EmersonDon BudgeArthur AsheFred PerryBill TildenLew HoadTony TrabertHenri CochetAthleteTackleTouchdown Foul PenaltyRefereeUmpireTeamLeagueChampionshipPlayoffsTournamentHurdlesShot putHammer throwPole vaultHigh jumpLong jumpTriple jumpBreaststrokeBackstrokeButterflyGymnasticsTumbleBalance beamFloor exercisePommel horseParallel barsRope climbBarbellDumbbellKnockoutSubmissionWrestlingGrappleKarateJudoTaekwondoKickboxingMuay ThaiKung FuSkateRollerbladeBMXRoad bikeSkateboardSnowboard Ski SlalomGiant slalomSuper-GDownhillHalfpipeMogulsSynchronized skatingAbdominal curlAdductorAnabolic steroidArmbarAthlete's footBackhandBaseball capBiceps curlBikingBodybuildingBox jumpBoxer's fractureBreak pointBulldozerCauliflower earChest pressClenched fistCoachingCompound exerciseCool downCross-trainingDeltoidDetoxDribbleDrop shotElevationEndorphinFair playFast ballFree throwRed CardFull court pressGolfLiverpoolGrand PrixAshStudio7FORMULAFOOT4KMan UnitedGroup exerciseHacky sackHammerHandballHerniaHula hoopHustleInline skatingJump shotKiteboardingKnee padLactic acidLeg pressLeg curlLeg extensionLiftingLigamentLine driveMartial artsMeniscusHat-trickWembleyManchesterMisdemeanorMud runTeo CRiOld TraffordNinja warriorOverhead pressOvertimePaintballParkourPenalty boxPersonal trainerPlyometricsQatarFOOTBALLERSWorld CupNBALEAGUEPSGPENALTYNFLSlam DunkArenaSport/i):upward(.ytd-expanded-shelf-contents-renderer,.ytd-rich-item-renderer)
Religion stuff
www.youtube.com##yt-formatted-string,p,a,span,.pure-u-1.pure-u-md-1-4,.ytd-rich-grid-media:has-text(/allahchristjesuschurchmosqueJesusChristHolyBibleFaithChurchSalvationGraceSon of GodSon of ManLordCrossresurrectionsaviorsalvationredemptionforgiveness holy sacredaltarworshipprayerpraisescripturerevelationprophecydoctrine faith theologybeliefdiscipleapostleevangelistpastorpriest bishop monk nun laypersonclergycongregationevangelismpreachingliturgysacramentsbaptismEucharistreconciliationordinationHoly Ordersanointing of the sickend timesrepentancesanctificationholinessrighteousnesshumilityobediencedevotionsurrendersubmissioncounselfear of the Lordreverencegenerositycompassionmercygracepuritysanctitypilgrimagesacrificeofferingtitheatonementexpiationpropitiationjustificationglorificationascensionpentecosttrinityholy spiritincarnateredeemermediatormessiahprophetpatriarchsaintmartyrvirginRamadandemon/i):upward(.ytd-expanded-shelf-contents-renderer,.ytd-rich-item-renderer) Once you apply it, you'll see just an empty spot over that video and just how much of the content is pushed. If you want to follow trends or any of the things above, feel free to edit it to block things you don't like. The codes above might also throw false positives.
If there is a better way to do this, please let me know in comments.
Thanks!