11:30 est to cst
BLΛƆKPIИK 🇯🇵 [BORN PINK] WORLD TOUR in OSAKA - JUNE 3-4
2016.06.29 03:03 mostinterestingtroll BLΛƆKPIИK 🇯🇵 [BORN PINK] WORLD TOUR in OSAKA - JUNE 3-4
BLACKPINK / 블랙핑크 (stylized as BLΛƆKPIИK) is a four-member K-pop girl group by YG Entertainment, consisting of members Jisoo, Jennie, Rosé, and Lisa. The group debuted on August 8th, 2016. BLACKPINK is represented by Interscope and Universal Music Group outside of Asia. Second subreddit: BeulPing
2017.03.29 07:27 Drakantas Eromanga Sensei
Community to talk and discuss about the light novels/manga/anime series Eromanga Sensei, written by the one and only, author of Oreimo, Tsukasa Fushimi. The "new sibling romantic comedy" revolves around Masamune Izumi, a light novel author in high school. Masamune's little sister is Sagiri, a shut-in girl who hasn't left her room for an entire year. Masamune wants his sister to leave her room, because the two of them are each other's only family.
2011.09.11 21:01 Oppressedtoaster SlashDiablo: A Diablo II Community Server
The official subreddit for a fantastic Diablo II community server.
2023.06.02 23:37 CrumbledOreos ✨Yes/No Questions, Timeframe and Tarot Readings!🐇
2023.06.02 23:36 daManiacLuvsU Should I just move?
2023.06.02 23:35 MarblesToday Marbles Today covers Tumult Turnpike and more! (Yes I know we're late, but these things take a lot of time to make!)
2023.06.02 23:35 bigbear0083 Wall Street Week Ahead for the trading week beginning June 5th, 2023
Good Friday evening to all of you here on
stocks! I hope everyone on this sub made out pretty nicely in the market this past week, and are ready for the new trading week ahead. :)
Here is everything you need to know to get you ready for the trading week beginning June 5th, 2023.
Dow leaps 700 points on hot jobs report, Nasdaq notches sixth straight winning week: Live updates - (Source)
The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged Friday as traders cheered a strong jobs report and the passage of a debt ceiling bill that averts a U.S. default.
The 30-stock Dow jumped 701.19 points, or 2.12%, to end at 33,762.76 — its best day since January. The S&P 500 climbed 1.45% to close at 4,282.37. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.07% to 13,240.77, reaching its highest level since April 2022 during the session.
With Friday’s gains, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished the holiday-shortened trading week about 1.8% and 2% higher, respectively. The Dow’s Friday advance pushed it into positive territory for the week, finishing up around 2%. The Nasdaq notched its sixth straight week higher, a streak length not seen for the technology-heavy index since 2020.
Nonfarm payrolls grew much more than expected in May, rising 339,000. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected a relatively modest 190,000 increase. It marked the 29th straight month of positive job growth.
Recently strong employment data had been pressuring stocks on the notion it would keep the Federal Reserve raising interest rates. But Friday data also showed average hourly earnings rose less than economists expected year over year, while the unemployment rate was higher than anticipated.
Both data points have given investors hope that the Fed could pause its interest rate hike campaign at the policy meeting later this month, according to Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.
“The so-called Goldilocks has entered the house,” Sandven said. “Clearly, on the bullish side, there are signs that inflation is starting to wane, speculation that the Fed is going to move into pause mode, increasing the likelihood of a soft landing.”
Easing concerns around the U.S. debt ceiling also helped sentiment. The Senate passed a bill to raise the debt ceiling late Thursday night, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk. That comes after the House passed the Fiscal Responsibility Act on Wednesday, just days before the June 5 deadline set by U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.
Lululemon shares popped more than 11% on strong results and a guidance boost, while MongoDB surged 28% on a blowout forecast.
This past week saw the following moves in the S&P:
S&P Sectors for this past week:
Major Indices for this past week:
Major Futures Markets as of Friday's close:
Economic Calendar for the Week Ahead:
Percentage Changes for the Major Indices, WTD, MTD, QTD, YTD as of Friday's close:
S&P Sectors for the Past Week:
Major Indices Pullback/Correction Levels as of Friday's close:
Major Indices Rally Levels as of Friday's close:
Most Anticipated Earnings Releases for this week:
Here are the upcoming IPO's for this week:
Friday's Stock Analyst Upgrades & Downgrades:
A Resilient Labor Market = A Resilient Economy
Another month, another employment surprise. Should we be surprised anymore?
Economists expected payrolls to grow by about 187,000 in May. That’s still a solid job growth number, but a stepdown from what we’ve seen this year through April. However, actual payroll growth beat expectations for the 14th straight month.
The economy created 339,000 jobs in May, close to double expectations. Better still, payroll growth in March and April were revised higher by a total of 93,000!
- March payrolls were revised up by 52,000, from 165,000 to 217,000
- April payroll were revised up by 41,000, from 253,000 to 294,000
We’ve got two months of payroll data since the Silicon Valley Bank crisis in March, and nothing suggests weakness arising from that banking crisis.
Over the first five months of the year, the economy’s added 1.5 million jobs. That in a nutshell tells you how the economy is doing. For perspective, the average annual payroll growth between 1940 and 2022 was 1.5 million. During the last expansion, 2010-2019, average annual payroll growth was 2.2 million per year.
But what about the unemployment rate?
The unemployment rate did rise from a 50-year low of 3.4% to 3.7%. This does raise some cause for concern but digging through the data suggests it may be noise more than anything else.
It probably helps to understand that the job growth and unemployment rate data come from different sources. The former comes from asking about 120,000+ businesses how many people they hired. The latter comes from asking about 60,000 households about their employment status. No surprise, the latter is noisier.
A big reason for the weak household survey (and rising unemployment rate) is that more than 400,000 people who were self-employed said they were no longer employed. As you can see in the following chart this is very noisy data, but the recent trend seems to be toward lower self-employment. It’s basically reversing the surge we saw in 2021, when self-employment surged. So, what we’re seeing now may simply be normalization of the labor market as more workers move from self-employment to W2 jobs with an employer.
Also, the unemployment rate can be impacted by people leaving the labor force (technically defined as those “not looking for work”) and an aging population. I’ve discussed in prior blogs how we can get around this by looking at the employment-population ratio for prime age workers, i.e. workers aged 25-54 years. This measures the number of people working as a percent of the civilian population. Think of it as the opposite of the unemployment rate, and because we use prime age, you also get around the demographic issue.
The good news is that the prime-age employment-population ratio dropped only a tick, from 80.8% to 80.7%. This still leaves it higher than at any point between 2002 and 2022.
All in all, the labor market remains strong and resilient, despite all the recession calls. Perhaps its not as strong as the headline payroll growth number of 339,000 suggests, but any number above 150,000 would be good at this point. And we’re certainly well above that.
In fact, looking at the job growth and employment-population data, this labor market is probably the strongest we’ve seen since the late 1990’s. Our view since the end of last year has been that the economy can avoid a recession this year, and nothing we’ve seen to date suggests we need to reverse that view. Far from it.
June Better in Pre-Election Years
Since 1971 June has shone brighter on NASDAQ stocks as a rule ranking eighth best with an 0.8% average gain, up 29 of 52 years. This contributes to NASDAQ’s “Best 8 Months” which ends in June. Small caps also fare well in June. Russell 2000 has averaged 0.6% in June since 1979 advancing 63.6% of the time.
June ranks near the bottom on the Dow Jones Industrials just above September since 1950 with an average loss of 0.2%. S&P 500 performs similarly poorly, ranking ninth, but essentially flat (0.02% average gain).
Despite being much stronger S&P 500 pre-election year June ranks fifth best. For the rest it is just sixth best. Average monthly gains in pre-election year June range from DJIA 1.1% to a respectable 2.4% for NASDAQ. Russell 2000 has been the most consistently bullish in pre-election years, up 8 of the last 11 (72.7% of the time).
The June Swoon?
Stocks did it again, as the S&P 500 gained 0.2% in the month of May, making it now 10 of the past 11 years that stocks finished green in May. Of course, it gained only 0.01% last year and only 0.25% this year, so the recent returns weren’t off the charts by any measure.
Looking specifically at this year, tech added more than 9% in May, thanks to excitement over AI and Nvidia, with communication services and consumer discretionary also in the green, while the other eight sectors were lower.
Specifically, turning to the month of June, stocks historically have hit a bit of trouble here. Since 1950, up 0.03% on average, the fourth worst month of the year. Over the past 20 years, only January and September have been worse and in the past decade, it is again the fourth worst month. The one bit of good news is during a pre-election year is it up 1.5%, the fifth-best month of the year.
Here’s another chart we’ve shared before, but years that gained big in January (like 2023) tend to see some periods of consolidation in late May/early June, but eventually experience a surge higher into July. Given the flattish overall May, this could be playing out again.
What if stocks were having a good year heading into June? Since 1950, if the S&P 500 was up more than 8% for the year going into June (like this year), the month of June was up an impressive 1.2% on average versus the average June return of 0.03%, while in a pre-election year the returns jumped to 1.8%. The percent of the time where returns were higher gets better as well, from 54.8% in your average June to nearly 74% if up 8% or more for the year heading into June, to 80% of the time higher if up 8% for the year in a pre-election year.
Overall, it has been a very nice run for stocks this year and we remain overweight stocks in the Carson Investment Research House Views. June could potentially cause some volatility, but when all is said and done, we wouldn’t bet against more strength and higher prices in June.
NASDAQ and Russell 2000 Lead June Pre-Election Strength
Over the last 21 years, June has been a rather lackluster month. DJIA, S&P 500 and Russell 1000 have all recorded average losses in the month. Russell 2000 has fared better with a modest average gain. Historically the month has opened respectably, advancing on the first and second trading days.
From there the market then drifted sideways and lower into negative territory just ahead of mid-month. Here the market rallied to create a nice mid-month bulge that quickly evaporated and returned to losses. The brisk, post, mid-month drop is typically followed by a month end rally led by technology and small caps.
Historical performance in pre-election years has been much stronger with all five indexes finishing with average gains. June’s overall pattern in pre-election is similar to the last 21-years pattern with a brief, shallow pullback after a solid start.
In pre-election years the mid-month rally has been much more robust beginning around the sixth trading day and lasting until the fifteenth. Followed by another modest retreat and rally into the end of Q2.
May and YTD 2023 Asset Class Performance
May 2023 is now behind us, and below is a look at how various asset classes performed during the month using US-listed exchange-traded products as proxies. We also include YTD and YoY total returns.
May was a month of divergence where Tech/AI soared, and the rest of the market fell. Notably, the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) gained 7.88% in May while the Dow Jones Dividend ETF (DVY) fell 7.7%. That's a 15 percentage-point spread!
At the sector level, it was a similar story. While the Tech sector (XLK) rose 8.9%, sectors like Energy (XLE), Consumer Staples (XLP), Materials (XLB), and Utilities (XLU) fell more than 5%. In total, 8 of 11 sectors were in the red for the month.
Outside the US, we saw pullbacks in most areas of the world other than Brazil, India, and Japan. China, Hong Kong, France, Canada, Italy, Spain, and the UK all fell more than 5%.
All of the commodity-related ETFs/ETNs were in the red for May, with oil (USO) and natural gas (UNG) falling the most at more than 10% each.
Finally, fixed-income ETFs also fell in May as interest rates bounced back. The aggregate bond market ETF (AGG) was down 1.14% in May, leaving it up just 2.6% YTD and down 2.2% year-over-year.
How Worried Should We Be About Consumer Debt?
A very common question we get these days is whether we’re concerned about the massive increase in consumer debt.
Short answer: No. Well, not yet anyway. But let’s walk through it in 6 charts.
The New York Federal Reserve (NY Fed) releases a quarterly report on household debt and credit, and the latest one that was released last week came with the headline:
“Household Debt Hits $17.05 Trillion in First Quarter.” But let’s look at the details. Household debt increased by $148 billion in Q1. That translates to a 0.9% increase, which is the slowest quarterly increase in two years. Most of the increase in debt was from mortgage originations ($121 billion) – mortgage debt makes up $12 trillion of the total $17 trillion in debt. The rest was auto loan and student loan balances.
Here’s something interesting: credit card balances were flat in Q1, at $986 billion. The fact that overall balances are higher than where they were in 2019 ($927 billion) should not be surprising given we just experienced a lot of inflation. Prices rose at the fastest pace in 40 years, and so you should expect card balances to increase. However, incomes rose as well.
When you think debt, the key question is whether households are able to service that debt. A good measure of that is to look at debt service costs as a percent of disposable income. As of Q4 2022, that’s at 9.7%, slightly lower than what it was before the pandemic and well below the historical average.
There’s even better news: disposable income grew 2.9% in the first quarter of 2023. Significantly higher than the 0.9% increase in total household debt, let alone interest costs!
Part of that includes the large boost to social security income due to inflation adjustments in January. Also, tax brackets were adjusted higher, resulting in more money in household wallets.
But even if you exclude these one-off increases, disposable income growth has been strong between February and April, rising at a 5% annualized pace. In fact, employee compensation by itself has risen at a 3.9% annualized pace over the past three months. Meanwhile, inflation is running just about 3% – which means households are seeing real income gains (adjusted for inflation).
This is why consumers don’t feel the need to borrow to the extent they did before the pandemic. Credit utilization rates measure credit card balances as a percent of available credit. As you can see in the following chart, utilization rates for both credit cards and home equity lines of credit are well below pre-pandemic averages.
Lack of stress showing in delinquency data as well
Another way to look for signs of consumer stress is to look at the debt delinquency data. As of the first quarter, the NY Fed survey showed that the percent of loan balances that were more than 90 days delinquent was stable around 1.5%. That’s down from 1.9% a year ago, and quite a bit below the 3% average in 2019.
Even third-party collections are at record lows, with just over 5% of consumers having collections against them as of the first quarter. This is down from 6% a year ago and below the 2019 average of 9.2%. The average collection amount per person is $1,316, which is lower than the $1,452 average in late 2019. This is surprising because just with inflation you’d have thought the amount would be higher.
All in all, the data on consumer finances is not showing much cause for concern. So, count us in the “not worried” camp. At least, not yet.
Some Good Inflation News
While the market prices in a much higher likelihood of a rate hike at the June meeting, there was actually some decent news on the inflation front today. Starting with the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence report, in this month's update, the inflation expectations component fell to 6.1% from a peak of 7.9% fifteen months ago in March 2022 (first time reading touched 7.9%). Looking at the chart below, this reading was also at 6.1% fifteen months before that first peak. In other words, for all the talk about how inflation has been stickier, the pace of decline in this indicator on the way down has been the same as the pace of increase on the way up.
Another notable report was today's release of the Dallas Fed Manufacturing report. The Prices Paid component of that report showed a decline from 19.5 down to 13.8 which was the lowest reading since July 2020. For the month of May, two of the five components (Empire and Philadelphia) showed modest m/m increases from multi-month lows, and three showed significant declines to multi-month lows. The chart below shows a composite of the Prices Paid component using the z-scores for each of the five individual components going back to 2010. The peak for this component was 19 months ago in November 2021. Unlike the inflation expectations of the Conference Board survey, this reading hasn't declined quite as fast as it increased in the 19 months leading up to the peak, but at -0.2, it is still below its historical average dating back to 2010 and back down to levels it was at right before the COVID shock hit the economy in early 2020.
Home Prices Bounce in Hardest Hit Areas
March data on home prices across the country were released today with updated S&P CoreLogic Case Shiller numbers. Case Shiller home prices had been falling rapidly in many of the twenty cities tracked, but in March we actually saw a pretty big month-over-month bounce in some of the hardest-hit areas like San Diego, San Francisco, LA, Denver, and Phoenix. Some cities still saw declines, however. Las Vegas saw a m/m drop of 0.93%, while Miami fell 0.41%, and Seattle fell 0.28%.
On a year-over-year basis, Miami is still up the most with a gain of 10.86%. As shown in the table below, Miami home prices are up 59.87% from pre-COVID levels in February 2020, and they're only down 2.9% from post-COVID highs. Only Tampa is up more than Miami from pre-COVID levels (+61.04%), but Tampa prices are down more from their post-COVID highs (-4.70%) than Miami (-2.90%).
Four cities are down more than 10% from their post-COVID highs: San Diego (-10.12%), Las Vegas (-10.95%), San Francisco (-16.35%), and Seattle (-16.50%). New York is down the least from post-COVID highs of any city tracked at just -2.9%.
Below we include charts of home price levels across all 20 cities tracked by Case Shiller along with the three composite indices. We've included a vertical red line on each chart to highlight pre-COVID levels. When looking through the charts, you can see this month's small bounce back in most cities after a 6-9 month pullback in prices from peaks seen early last year.
Here is the list of notable tickers reporting earnings in this upcoming trading week ahead-
(*T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.)
([CLICK HERE FOR MONDAY'S PRE-MARKET NOTABLE EARNINGS RELEASES!]())
(N/A.)
Here is the full list of companies report earnings for this upcoming trading week ahead which includes the date/time of release & consensus estimates courtesy of Earnings Whispers:
Monday 6.5.23 Before Market Open:
Monday 6.5.23 After Market Close:
Tuesday 6.6.23 Before Market Open:
Tuesday 6.6.23 After Market Close:
Wednesday 6.7.23 Before Market Open:
Wednesday 6.7.23 After Market Close:
Thursday 6.8.23 Before Market Open:
Thursday 6.8.23 After Market Close:
Friday 6.9.23 Before Market Open:
Friday 6.9.23 After Market Close:
([CLICK HERE FOR FRIDAY'S AFTER-MARKET EARNINGS TIME & ESTIMATES!]())
(NONE.)
(T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.)
(T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.) (T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.).
DISCUSS!
What are you all watching for in this upcoming trading week?
I hope you all have a wonderful weekend and a great new trading week ahead stocks. :)
submitted by
bigbear0083 to
stocks [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:34 Butterlord120 Router randomly not giving any internet
Hi,
I've been experiencing this issue for a while now where my router will randomly just lose all internet and won't start functioning again until I reboot it. Recently I had it happen once a day for about 3 days straight, I did do a factory reset on the router recently and it had no problems for 3 days until today.
When it did this at one point I connected my computer to the modem directly and that was giving me internet, while my router was not. So it's something with the router seemingly, but there's no pattern which makes it hard to say if its messed up physically. As I've gone multiple weeks previously without issues and then other times it'll be a problem daily for a few days and go away again.
Another strange issue is that when I goto the router's page when the internet "goes down", over ethernet and wifi no internet will be working at all but the dashboard on the router page will still say its connected.
The router is an Asus GT-AC2900 and it was purchased brand new less than a year ago.
it's using firmware: 3.0.0.4.386_51529-g70acb9d which as of this post is the most up to date firmware.
If anyone has any ideas they would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
Below here is a log from today if that is of any use:
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module uas not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 rc_service: ntp 1620:notify_rc restart_diskmon
Jun 2 15:57:17 rc_service: waitting "restart_firewall" via ...
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module mbcache not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module jbd not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module ext3 not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module ext4 not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module ext2 not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Tuxera FAT 12/16/32 driver version 3016.7.20 [Flags: W MODULE].
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Built against headers 4.1.27 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 5 11:59:06 CST 2019 arm64
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Running on kernel 4.1.27 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 8 11:37:30 CST 2023 aarch64
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Tuxera NTFS driver 3018.6.22d [Flags: W MODULE].
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Built against headers 4.1.27 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 5 11:59:06 CST 2019 arm64
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Running on kernel 4.1.27 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 8 11:37:30 CST 2023 aarch64
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Tuxera HFS+ driver 3017.6.20
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Built against headers 4.1.27 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 5 11:59:06 CST 2019 arm64
Jun 2 15:57:17 kernel: Running on kernel 4.1.27 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 8 11:37:30 CST 2023 aarch64
Jun 2 15:57:17 modprobe: module btusbdrv not found in modules.dep
Jun 2 15:57:17 init: fwver: 3.0.0.4_386_51529-g70acb9d (sn: /ha:F0:2F:74:C6:5B:10 )
Jun 2 15:57:17 ahs: [read_json]Update ahs JSON file.
Jun 2 15:57:18 miniupnpd[1303]: shutting down MiniUPnPd
Jun 2 15:57:18 miniupnpd: it is advised to use network interface name instead of
192.168.50.1/255.255.255.0 Jun 2 15:57:18 miniupnpd[1722]: HTTP listening on port 36437
Jun 2 15:57:18 miniupnpd[1722]: Listening for NAT-PMP/PCP traffic on port 5351
Jun 2 15:57:18 disk_monitor: Finish
Jun 2 15:57:18 disk monitor: be idle
Jun 2 15:57:18 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jun 2 15:57:18 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jun 2 15:57:18 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10009 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jun 2 15:57:18 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 20009 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jun 2 15:57:18 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10033 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jun 2 15:57:18 dhcp client: bound
198.2.89.98/255.255.255.224 via
198.2.89.97 for 172800 seconds.
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPDISCOVER(br0) bc:20:ba:f4:90:75
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPOFFER(br0)
192.168.50.63 bc:20:ba:f4:90:75
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: read /etc/hosts - 20 addresses
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.4.4#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.8.8#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f Pixel-3a
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: read /etc/hosts - 20 addresses
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.4.4#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.8.8#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f Pixel-3a
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: read /etc/hosts - 20 addresses
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.4.4#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq[1151]: using nameserver
8.8.8.8#53 Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.232 9e:69:a3:e1:bb:9f Pixel-3a
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.63 bc:20:ba:f4:90:75
Jun 2 15:57:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.63 bc:20:ba:f4:90:75
Jun 2 15:57:22 BONDING: option disabled
Jun 2 15:57:23 roamast: ROAMING Start...
Jun 2 15:58:04 crond[1159]: time disparity of 2670652 minutes detected
Jun 2 15:58:19 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.251 00:18:61:4f:35:e5
Jun 2 15:58:19 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.251 00:18:61:4f:35:e5 myx_0018614F35E4
Jun 2 15:58:58 ahs: [read_json]Update ahs JSON file.
Jun 2 15:59:12 WATCHDOG: [FAUPGRADE][auto_firmware_check:(7789)]periodic_check AM 5:53
Jun 2 15:59:12 WATCHDOG: [FAUPGRADE][auto_firmware_check:(7833)]do webs_update
Jun 2 15:59:14 HMA: Download version info failed, retry=[4]
Jun 2 15:59:17 HMA: Download version info failed, retry=[3]
Jun 2 15:59:20 HMA: Download version info failed, retry=[2]
Jun 2 15:59:22 WATCHDOG: [FAUPGRADE][auto_firmware_check:(7851)]retrieve firmware information
Jun 2 15:59:22 WATCHDOG: [FAUPGRADE][auto_firmware_check:(7866)]fimrware update check first time
Jun 2 15:59:22 WATCHDOG: [FAUPGRADE][auto_firmware_check:(7897)]no need to upgrade firmware
Jun 2 15:59:23 HMA: Download version info failed, retry=[1]
Jun 2 15:59:26 HMA: Download version info failed, retry=[0]
Jun 2 16:00:18 disk_monitor: Got SIGALRM...
Jun 2 16:01:52 kernel: eth3 (Ext switch port: 2) (Logical Port: 10) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Jun 2 16:01:52 kernel: br0: port 3(eth3) entered listening state
Jun 2 16:01:52 kernel: br0: port 3(eth3) entered listening state
Jun 2 16:01:54 kernel: br0: port 3(eth3) entered learning state
Jun 2 16:01:56 kernel: br0: topology change detected, propagating
Jun 2 16:01:56 kernel: br0: port 3(eth3) entered forwarding state
Jun 2 16:02:00 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPDISCOVER(br0) 1c:1e:1e:f1:da:18
Jun 2 16:02:00 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPOFFER(br0)
192.168.50.233 1c:1e:1e:f1:da:18
Jun 2 16:02:00 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.233 1c:1e:1e:f1:da:18
Jun 2 16:02:00 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.233 1c:1e:1e:f1:da:18
Jun 2 16:02:23 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(530): eth6: Auth 8C:85:90:27:B4:67, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Jun 2 16:02:23 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(559): eth6: Assoc 8C:85:90:27:B4:67, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Jun 2 16:02:23 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.179 8c:85:90:27:b4:67
Jun 2 16:02:23 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.179 8c:85:90:27:b4:67 Koreys-MBP
Jun 2 16:03:56 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(530): eth5: Auth 32:81:50:75:44:BA, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Jun 2 16:03:56 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(559): eth5: Assoc 32:81:50:75:44:BA, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Jun 2 16:03:57 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.150 32:81:50:75:44:ba
Jun 2 16:03:57 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.150 32:81:50:75:44:ba
Jun 2 16:23:55 kernel: nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead.
Jun 2 16:26:30 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(511): eth6: Disassoc 8C:85:90:27:B4:67, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Jun 2 16:53:14 kernel: eth4 (Ext switch port: 3) (Logical Port: 11) Link DOWN.
Jun 2 16:53:14 kernel: br0: port 4(eth4) entered disabled state
Jun 2 16:54:06 kernel: eth4 (Ext switch port: 3) (Logical Port: 11) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Jun 2 16:54:06 kernel: br0: port 4(eth4) entered listening state
Jun 2 16:54:06 kernel: br0: port 4(eth4) entered listening state
Jun 2 16:54:08 kernel: br0: port 4(eth4) entered learning state
Jun 2 16:54:10 kernel: br0: topology change detected, propagating
Jun 2 16:54:10 kernel: br0: port 4(eth4) entered forwarding state
Jun 2 16:54:13 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPREQUEST(br0)
192.168.50.210 18:c0:4d:91:09:b5
Jun 2 16:54:13 dnsmasq-dhcp[1151]: DHCPACK(br0)
192.168.50.210 18:c0:4d:91:09:b5 DESKTOP-HI2IKS0
submitted by
Butterlord120 to
HomeNetworking [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:34 figure85 Alphabet Town (A-Z): Needle in the Hay is the winner for N. Day 14 is letter O, top comment wins!
There was a real battle for 2nd and 3rd, every time I hit refresh they would jump back and forth, but I've been trying to score the polls around 3:30 PM EST, to keep on track.
elliottsmith favorite song A-Y (No V, X, or Z songs)
https://web.archive.org/web/20201112035056/https://songs.alphabet-town.com/songguide A- Angeles B- Between the Bars C- Clementine D- Dancing on the Highway E- Everything Means Nothing To Me F- A Fond Farewell G- Going Nowhere H- Happiness I- Independence Day J- Junk Bond Trader K- King's Crossing L- Last Call M- Miss Misery
N- Needle in the Hay
O- ?
P- Q- R- S- T- U- W- Y- #-
Top 3 N songs:
1st: Needle in the Hay - 41
2nd: No Name #3 - 26
3rd: New Disaster - 24
submitted by
figure85 to
elliottsmith [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:33 bigbear0083 Wall Street Week Ahead for the trading week beginning June 5th, 2023
Good Friday evening to all of you here on
StockMarketChat! I hope everyone on this sub made out pretty nicely in the market this past week, and are ready for the new trading week ahead. :)
Here is everything you need to know to get you ready for the trading week beginning June 5th, 2023.
Dow leaps 700 points on hot jobs report, Nasdaq notches sixth straight winning week: Live updates - (Source)
The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged Friday as traders cheered a strong jobs report and the passage of a debt ceiling bill that averts a U.S. default.
The 30-stock Dow jumped 701.19 points, or 2.12%, to end at 33,762.76 — its best day since January. The S&P 500 climbed 1.45% to close at 4,282.37. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.07% to 13,240.77, reaching its highest level since April 2022 during the session.
With Friday’s gains, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished the holiday-shortened trading week about 1.8% and 2% higher, respectively. The Dow’s Friday advance pushed it into positive territory for the week, finishing up around 2%. The Nasdaq notched its sixth straight week higher, a streak length not seen for the technology-heavy index since 2020.
Nonfarm payrolls grew much more than expected in May, rising 339,000. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected a relatively modest 190,000 increase. It marked the 29th straight month of positive job growth.
Recently strong employment data had been pressuring stocks on the notion it would keep the Federal Reserve raising interest rates. But Friday data also showed average hourly earnings rose less than economists expected year over year, while the unemployment rate was higher than anticipated.
Both data points have given investors hope that the Fed could pause its interest rate hike campaign at the policy meeting later this month, according to Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.
“The so-called Goldilocks has entered the house,” Sandven said. “Clearly, on the bullish side, there are signs that inflation is starting to wane, speculation that the Fed is going to move into pause mode, increasing the likelihood of a soft landing.”
Easing concerns around the U.S. debt ceiling also helped sentiment. The Senate passed a bill to raise the debt ceiling late Thursday night, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk. That comes after the House passed the Fiscal Responsibility Act on Wednesday, just days before the June 5 deadline set by U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.
Lululemon shares popped more than 11% on strong results and a guidance boost, while MongoDB surged 28% on a blowout forecast.
This past week saw the following moves in the S&P:
S&P Sectors for this past week:
Major Indices for this past week:
Major Futures Markets as of Friday's close:
Economic Calendar for the Week Ahead:
Percentage Changes for the Major Indices, WTD, MTD, QTD, YTD as of Friday's close:
S&P Sectors for the Past Week:
Major Indices Pullback/Correction Levels as of Friday's close:
Major Indices Rally Levels as of Friday's close:
Most Anticipated Earnings Releases for this week:
Here are the upcoming IPO's for this week:
Friday's Stock Analyst Upgrades & Downgrades:
A Resilient Labor Market = A Resilient Economy
Another month, another employment surprise. Should we be surprised anymore?
Economists expected payrolls to grow by about 187,000 in May. That’s still a solid job growth number, but a stepdown from what we’ve seen this year through April. However, actual payroll growth beat expectations for the 14th straight month.
The economy created 339,000 jobs in May, close to double expectations. Better still, payroll growth in March and April were revised higher by a total of 93,000!
- March payrolls were revised up by 52,000, from 165,000 to 217,000
- April payroll were revised up by 41,000, from 253,000 to 294,000
We’ve got two months of payroll data since the Silicon Valley Bank crisis in March, and nothing suggests weakness arising from that banking crisis.
Over the first five months of the year, the economy’s added 1.5 million jobs. That in a nutshell tells you how the economy is doing. For perspective, the average annual payroll growth between 1940 and 2022 was 1.5 million. During the last expansion, 2010-2019, average annual payroll growth was 2.2 million per year.
But what about the unemployment rate?
The unemployment rate did rise from a 50-year low of 3.4% to 3.7%. This does raise some cause for concern but digging through the data suggests it may be noise more than anything else.
It probably helps to understand that the job growth and unemployment rate data come from different sources. The former comes from asking about 120,000+ businesses how many people they hired. The latter comes from asking about 60,000 households about their employment status. No surprise, the latter is noisier.
A big reason for the weak household survey (and rising unemployment rate) is that more than 400,000 people who were self-employed said they were no longer employed. As you can see in the following chart this is very noisy data, but the recent trend seems to be toward lower self-employment. It’s basically reversing the surge we saw in 2021, when self-employment surged. So, what we’re seeing now may simply be normalization of the labor market as more workers move from self-employment to W2 jobs with an employer.
Also, the unemployment rate can be impacted by people leaving the labor force (technically defined as those “not looking for work”) and an aging population. I’ve discussed in prior blogs how we can get around this by looking at the employment-population ratio for prime age workers, i.e. workers aged 25-54 years. This measures the number of people working as a percent of the civilian population. Think of it as the opposite of the unemployment rate, and because we use prime age, you also get around the demographic issue.
The good news is that the prime-age employment-population ratio dropped only a tick, from 80.8% to 80.7%. This still leaves it higher than at any point between 2002 and 2022.
All in all, the labor market remains strong and resilient, despite all the recession calls. Perhaps its not as strong as the headline payroll growth number of 339,000 suggests, but any number above 150,000 would be good at this point. And we’re certainly well above that.
In fact, looking at the job growth and employment-population data, this labor market is probably the strongest we’ve seen since the late 1990’s. Our view since the end of last year has been that the economy can avoid a recession this year, and nothing we’ve seen to date suggests we need to reverse that view. Far from it.
June Better in Pre-Election Years
Since 1971 June has shone brighter on NASDAQ stocks as a rule ranking eighth best with an 0.8% average gain, up 29 of 52 years. This contributes to NASDAQ’s “Best 8 Months” which ends in June. Small caps also fare well in June. Russell 2000 has averaged 0.6% in June since 1979 advancing 63.6% of the time.
June ranks near the bottom on the Dow Jones Industrials just above September since 1950 with an average loss of 0.2%. S&P 500 performs similarly poorly, ranking ninth, but essentially flat (0.02% average gain).
Despite being much stronger S&P 500 pre-election year June ranks fifth best. For the rest it is just sixth best. Average monthly gains in pre-election year June range from DJIA 1.1% to a respectable 2.4% for NASDAQ. Russell 2000 has been the most consistently bullish in pre-election years, up 8 of the last 11 (72.7% of the time).
The June Swoon?
Stocks did it again, as the S&P 500 gained 0.2% in the month of May, making it now 10 of the past 11 years that stocks finished green in May. Of course, it gained only 0.01% last year and only 0.25% this year, so the recent returns weren’t off the charts by any measure.
Looking specifically at this year, tech added more than 9% in May, thanks to excitement over AI and Nvidia, with communication services and consumer discretionary also in the green, while the other eight sectors were lower.
Specifically, turning to the month of June, stocks historically have hit a bit of trouble here. Since 1950, up 0.03% on average, the fourth worst month of the year. Over the past 20 years, only January and September have been worse and in the past decade, it is again the fourth worst month. The one bit of good news is during a pre-election year is it up 1.5%, the fifth-best month of the year.
Here’s another chart we’ve shared before, but years that gained big in January (like 2023) tend to see some periods of consolidation in late May/early June, but eventually experience a surge higher into July. Given the flattish overall May, this could be playing out again.
What if stocks were having a good year heading into June? Since 1950, if the S&P 500 was up more than 8% for the year going into June (like this year), the month of June was up an impressive 1.2% on average versus the average June return of 0.03%, while in a pre-election year the returns jumped to 1.8%. The percent of the time where returns were higher gets better as well, from 54.8% in your average June to nearly 74% if up 8% or more for the year heading into June, to 80% of the time higher if up 8% for the year in a pre-election year.
Overall, it has been a very nice run for stocks this year and we remain overweight stocks in the Carson Investment Research House Views. June could potentially cause some volatility, but when all is said and done, we wouldn’t bet against more strength and higher prices in June.
NASDAQ and Russell 2000 Lead June Pre-Election Strength
Over the last 21 years, June has been a rather lackluster month. DJIA, S&P 500 and Russell 1000 have all recorded average losses in the month. Russell 2000 has fared better with a modest average gain. Historically the month has opened respectably, advancing on the first and second trading days.
From there the market then drifted sideways and lower into negative territory just ahead of mid-month. Here the market rallied to create a nice mid-month bulge that quickly evaporated and returned to losses. The brisk, post, mid-month drop is typically followed by a month end rally led by technology and small caps.
Historical performance in pre-election years has been much stronger with all five indexes finishing with average gains. June’s overall pattern in pre-election is similar to the last 21-years pattern with a brief, shallow pullback after a solid start.
In pre-election years the mid-month rally has been much more robust beginning around the sixth trading day and lasting until the fifteenth. Followed by another modest retreat and rally into the end of Q2.
May and YTD 2023 Asset Class Performance
May 2023 is now behind us, and below is a look at how various asset classes performed during the month using US-listed exchange-traded products as proxies. We also include YTD and YoY total returns.
May was a month of divergence where Tech/AI soared, and the rest of the market fell. Notably, the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) gained 7.88% in May while the Dow Jones Dividend ETF (DVY) fell 7.7%. That's a 15 percentage-point spread!
At the sector level, it was a similar story. While the Tech sector (XLK) rose 8.9%, sectors like Energy (XLE), Consumer Staples (XLP), Materials (XLB), and Utilities (XLU) fell more than 5%. In total, 8 of 11 sectors were in the red for the month.
Outside the US, we saw pullbacks in most areas of the world other than Brazil, India, and Japan. China, Hong Kong, France, Canada, Italy, Spain, and the UK all fell more than 5%.
All of the commodity-related ETFs/ETNs were in the red for May, with oil (USO) and natural gas (UNG) falling the most at more than 10% each.
Finally, fixed-income ETFs also fell in May as interest rates bounced back. The aggregate bond market ETF (AGG) was down 1.14% in May, leaving it up just 2.6% YTD and down 2.2% year-over-year.
How Worried Should We Be About Consumer Debt?
A very common question we get these days is whether we’re concerned about the massive increase in consumer debt.
Short answer: No. Well, not yet anyway. But let’s walk through it in 6 charts.
The New York Federal Reserve (NY Fed) releases a quarterly report on household debt and credit, and the latest one that was released last week came with the headline:
“Household Debt Hits $17.05 Trillion in First Quarter.” But let’s look at the details. Household debt increased by $148 billion in Q1. That translates to a 0.9% increase, which is the slowest quarterly increase in two years. Most of the increase in debt was from mortgage originations ($121 billion) – mortgage debt makes up $12 trillion of the total $17 trillion in debt. The rest was auto loan and student loan balances.
Here’s something interesting: credit card balances were flat in Q1, at $986 billion. The fact that overall balances are higher than where they were in 2019 ($927 billion) should not be surprising given we just experienced a lot of inflation. Prices rose at the fastest pace in 40 years, and so you should expect card balances to increase. However, incomes rose as well.
When you think debt, the key question is whether households are able to service that debt. A good measure of that is to look at debt service costs as a percent of disposable income. As of Q4 2022, that’s at 9.7%, slightly lower than what it was before the pandemic and well below the historical average.
There’s even better news: disposable income grew 2.9% in the first quarter of 2023. Significantly higher than the 0.9% increase in total household debt, let alone interest costs!
Part of that includes the large boost to social security income due to inflation adjustments in January. Also, tax brackets were adjusted higher, resulting in more money in household wallets.
But even if you exclude these one-off increases, disposable income growth has been strong between February and April, rising at a 5% annualized pace. In fact, employee compensation by itself has risen at a 3.9% annualized pace over the past three months. Meanwhile, inflation is running just about 3% – which means households are seeing real income gains (adjusted for inflation).
This is why consumers don’t feel the need to borrow to the extent they did before the pandemic. Credit utilization rates measure credit card balances as a percent of available credit. As you can see in the following chart, utilization rates for both credit cards and home equity lines of credit are well below pre-pandemic averages.
Lack of stress showing in delinquency data as well
Another way to look for signs of consumer stress is to look at the debt delinquency data. As of the first quarter, the NY Fed survey showed that the percent of loan balances that were more than 90 days delinquent was stable around 1.5%. That’s down from 1.9% a year ago, and quite a bit below the 3% average in 2019.
Even third-party collections are at record lows, with just over 5% of consumers having collections against them as of the first quarter. This is down from 6% a year ago and below the 2019 average of 9.2%. The average collection amount per person is $1,316, which is lower than the $1,452 average in late 2019. This is surprising because just with inflation you’d have thought the amount would be higher.
All in all, the data on consumer finances is not showing much cause for concern. So, count us in the “not worried” camp. At least, not yet.
Some Good Inflation News
While the market prices in a much higher likelihood of a rate hike at the June meeting, there was actually some decent news on the inflation front today. Starting with the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence report, in this month's update, the inflation expectations component fell to 6.1% from a peak of 7.9% fifteen months ago in March 2022 (first time reading touched 7.9%). Looking at the chart below, this reading was also at 6.1% fifteen months before that first peak. In other words, for all the talk about how inflation has been stickier, the pace of decline in this indicator on the way down has been the same as the pace of increase on the way up.
Another notable report was today's release of the Dallas Fed Manufacturing report. The Prices Paid component of that report showed a decline from 19.5 down to 13.8 which was the lowest reading since July 2020. For the month of May, two of the five components (Empire and Philadelphia) showed modest m/m increases from multi-month lows, and three showed significant declines to multi-month lows. The chart below shows a composite of the Prices Paid component using the z-scores for each of the five individual components going back to 2010. The peak for this component was 19 months ago in November 2021. Unlike the inflation expectations of the Conference Board survey, this reading hasn't declined quite as fast as it increased in the 19 months leading up to the peak, but at -0.2, it is still below its historical average dating back to 2010 and back down to levels it was at right before the COVID shock hit the economy in early 2020.
Home Prices Bounce in Hardest Hit Areas
March data on home prices across the country were released today with updated S&P CoreLogic Case Shiller numbers. Case Shiller home prices had been falling rapidly in many of the twenty cities tracked, but in March we actually saw a pretty big month-over-month bounce in some of the hardest-hit areas like San Diego, San Francisco, LA, Denver, and Phoenix. Some cities still saw declines, however. Las Vegas saw a m/m drop of 0.93%, while Miami fell 0.41%, and Seattle fell 0.28%.
On a year-over-year basis, Miami is still up the most with a gain of 10.86%. As shown in the table below, Miami home prices are up 59.87% from pre-COVID levels in February 2020, and they're only down 2.9% from post-COVID highs. Only Tampa is up more than Miami from pre-COVID levels (+61.04%), but Tampa prices are down more from their post-COVID highs (-4.70%) than Miami (-2.90%).
Four cities are down more than 10% from their post-COVID highs: San Diego (-10.12%), Las Vegas (-10.95%), San Francisco (-16.35%), and Seattle (-16.50%). New York is down the least from post-COVID highs of any city tracked at just -2.9%.
Below we include charts of home price levels across all 20 cities tracked by Case Shiller along with the three composite indices. We've included a vertical red line on each chart to highlight pre-COVID levels. When looking through the charts, you can see this month's small bounce back in most cities after a 6-9 month pullback in prices from peaks seen early last year.
STOCK MARKET VIDEO: Stock Market Analysis Video for Week Ending June 5th, 2023
(VIDEO NOT YET POSTED.)
STOCK MARKET VIDEO: ShadowTrader Video Weekly 6/2/23
([CLICK HERE FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEO!]())
(VIDEO NOT YET POSTED.)
Here is the list of notable tickers reporting earnings in this upcoming trading week ahead-
($NIO $GTLB $GME $CIEN $DOCU $SAIC $ASO $SJM $CXM $THO $OLLI $MOMO $CBRL $FERG $TTC $HQY $CPB $PLAY $QMCO $FCEL $LOVE $ABM $CNM $HTOO $TCOM $JOAN $UNFI $SFIX $CHS $GIII $SIG $SMAR $PL $ZFOX $HYZN $VRA $CASY $MTN $SMTC $ALYA $DBI $SCWX $JILL $OESX $BSE $REVG $VBNK $VRNT $RENT $HCP)
([CLICK HERE FOR MONDAY'S PRE-MARKET NOTABLE EARNINGS RELEASES!]())
(N/A.)
Here is the full list of companies report earnings for this upcoming trading week ahead which includes the date/time of release & consensus estimates courtesy of Earnings Whispers:
Monday 6.5.23 Before Market Open:
Monday 6.5.23 After Market Close:
Tuesday 6.6.23 Before Market Open:
Tuesday 6.6.23 After Market Close:
Wednesday 6.7.23 Before Market Open:
Wednesday 6.7.23 After Market Close:
Thursday 6.8.23 Before Market Open:
Thursday 6.8.23 After Market Close:
Friday 6.9.23 Before Market Open:
Friday 6.9.23 After Market Close:
([CLICK HERE FOR FRIDAY'S AFTER-MARKET EARNINGS TIME & ESTIMATES!]())
(NONE.)
(T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.)
(T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.) (T.B.A. THIS WEEKEND.).
DISCUSS!
What are you all watching for in this upcoming trading week?
Join the Official Reddit Stock Market Chat Discord Server HERE!
I hope you all have a wonderful weekend and a great new trading week ahead StockMarketChat. :)
submitted by
bigbear0083 to
StockMarketChat [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:31 jab136 Ticker that halted and didn't resume last week is still halted, there was also a halt that showed up in the data today that claims to have started on May 6 and resumed today. Problem is that May 6 was a Saturday. We really need a glitch better have my money flair.
| There weren't a ton of halts during this short week, the highest day was yesterday with 29 halts on 11 tickers. The 20 day average dropped from the 90th percentile last Friday down to just barely in the 70th percentile today because it lost the 5 days from about a month ago when there were an average of more than 100 halts per day. The 50 day average remained in the 80th percentile all week. Ok, now on to my regular post... Disclaimer due to recent issues in relation to brigading. I am simply attempting to provide a metric for market wide volatility as a possible alternative to other volatility indices such as VIX. I will talk about quite a few tickers other than GME, but that is simply an attempt to comment on odd or interesting behavior from those stocks that didn't match with the average. I am not advocating for or against any of those other tickers, simply attempting to give data and context for that data. I originally started looking at halt data when I got curious about which other stocks halted between Jan 27 and Jan 29 of 2021 to see if I could find a pattern or some interesting data that might be useful down the line. For anyone wondering what use it is to have a volatility index or why an alternative to VIX could be useful, this comment chain from my post on December 26th 2022 gives a pretty good ELIA. Also, there has been a lot of chatter on and off over the last few years about VIX and I for one would love to have an alternative that it can just be compared to since more data is always better IMO. VIX ELIA Using education tag this week because of the glitched tickers. Previous posts on this topic An analysis of all of the stocks that halted in the first minute of trading on 1/24/23. ( part 1 part 2) Daily post about 12/9 with highest number of halts on a single ticker in over 2 years. Recent daily tracking post with info about halts going way past 16:00:00 EST NYSE halt tracking page is seeing some glitches (or possible just odd behavior) over the last few days. (Posted 9/30) Market Wide Limit Up Limit Down (LULD halts) significantly higher than normal. Over 100 halts today on 28 different tickers. (posted on August 2) An analysis of every stock that had an LULD halt between Jan 27 and Jan 29 of last year. (posted June 15) Adding a further TLDR per mod request; LULD halts are volatility halts on a specific ticker that halts trading for a minimum of 5 minutes on that ticker. Several months ago I realized that the NYSE records all the halts that happen every trading day and save them on a website. So knowing this, I wondered if I could possibly find other tickers that had a significant number of halts between Jan 27 and Jan 29 of last year. When I looked at the data, I found a lot of the usual suspects and a few other tickers that hadn't really been discussed previously very much as possible swap basket stocks. I also found that, while the volume of halts did spike in that period last year, the highest period by far in the available data was in mid March 2020. So I theorized that halts are likely correlated to market volatility and may provide an alternative metric to VIX. There has also been some odd activity with resume times for some halts going significantly into after hours (halts typically resume by 16:00:01 EST at the latest). Ok, now that that is out of the way, I have continued monitoring the NYSE page that tracks halts. Wednesday, and Thursday both had halts going into the closing bell this week. Both days had a resume at 16:00:00 EST which is completely normal. However there are now 2 tickers that are having very odd behavior with multi day halts. As I posted on Monday there was a ticker that had a halt last Wednesday 5/24 that hadn't resumed by the end of last week. It has remained halted through this entire week and is still showing up in the halts data. The historic data is also showing several halts all starting at the same time on that ticker when it halted last week, I am only including a single halt. There was another ticker that had very odd behavior in terms of a nearly month long halt that started on a Saturday somehow. It had not shown up previously as a volatility (LULD) halt so I am not completely certain what is going on. There was only one ticker this week that had more than 10 halts, that ticker was SDA (SunCar Technology Group Inc.) . This seems to be a chinese company that deals in auto and truck insurance. The news page on yahoo has absolutely no news for this company however it appears that something is definitely going on with it over the last few months. It was trading very steadily at around $10 for years, and then on April 14 it dropped to close at $8 after hitting a low of $6.71. It has been very volatile ever since, and then it had 28 halts this week. 15 of the halts were on Tuesday when it went from an opening price of $18.61 to a closing price of $43.05 (+309.61%) which was also the daily high. It leveled off a bit yesterday and had a very volatile day (low was $26.63, high was $45.73) however it closed at $43.31. It plummeted today, opening all the way down at $31.06, it had a high of $40.35 and closed at $21.34 (-46.20%). I have absolutely no idea what exactly is going on but something is definitely going on. MEOA (Minority Equality Opportunities Acquisition Inc) is a shell company or SPAC out of Texas. It has been trading for a while. It was supposed to have it's shareholders meeting on last Tuesday (5/23), but it was postponed to Wednesday, then to Friday then again to this past Wednesday (5/31). It closed last Tuesday at $11.05, then rocketed to a high of $43.50 before falling down to $26.54 at the time of the halt. It has not resumed and no trades have been made since then. It had 15 halts last Wednesday. It doesn't have another shareholder meeting postponement on yahoo finance, but it also still hasn't resumed. SNMP (Evolve Transition Infrastructure LP) is an oil and gas company out of Texas. It has been trading for a while but has been having some issues recently meeting the continued listing requirements since it is trading at just $0.06 per share currently. Today's data from the NYSE lists it as having been paused on 5/6/2023 at 12:03:15 EST and shows a resume today at 09:35:25. Adding to my confusion here is the fact that it has been trading for that entire period and was not listed previously in the data from that week. This is a penny stock so it could be something related to that, but IDK. The table with halts that had multi day halts or halts without a resume time is going to stay at the top of the post this week because of MEOA and SNMP. All tickers that have halted one day and not resumed until the next or don't have a resume date on NYSE page Date halted | Date resumed (duration in trading days) | Ticker | 11/26/2019 | 11/27/2019 (1) | TKKSU | 03/12/2020 | 03/13/2020 (1) | CPTAG | 03/12/2020 | 03/16/2020 (2) | A-M-C-I-U | 03/16/2020 | 03/18/2020 (2) | AMHCU | 03/16/2020 | 03/18/2020 (2) | BDCY | 03/18/2020 | 03/27/2020 (7) | IBKCN | 03/18/2020 | 03/19/2020 (1) | SRACU | 03/18/2020 | 06/04/2020 (54) | PAACU | 03/19/2020 | 03/20/2020 (1) | ZIONP | 03/20/2020 | 03/24/2020 (2) | BPYUP | 03/23/2020 | 5/7/2020 (32) | WKEY | 03/24/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, but I see data as late as December 1, 2022 on yahoo | SMDY | 03/24/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, but I see data as late as Friday on yahoo | AFMC | 03/24/2020 | 03/25/2020 (1) | FLQM | 03/24/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, but I see data as late as Friday on yahoo | ESGS | 03/24/2020 | 03/25/2020 (1) | IQM | 03/24/2020 | 03/25/2020 (1) | PEXL | 03/31/2020 | 04/01/2020 (1) | MBNKP | 04/03/2020 | 04/06/2020 (1) | MDRRP | 04/13/2020 | 04/14/2020 (1) | TECTP | 04/20/2020 | 06/17/2020 (41) | PNBK | 05/18/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, but I see data as late as August 2020 on barchart | PMOM | 06/04/2020 | 06/10/2020 (4) | MLPO | 11/13/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, but I see data as late as April of this year on yahoo | CHPMU | 12/14/2020 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, can't find on yahoo or barchart so probably actually defunct | MNCLU | 03/24/2021 | 2 halts listed on same ticker starting at same time, one resumed 03/25/2021, the other never resumed | HPR | 08/19/2021 | Never resumed according to NYSE page, can't find on yahoo or barchart so probably actually defunct | LIVKU | 05/24/2023 | 2 halts listed on same ticker starting at same time. Neither has an official resume time yet and the ticker has not moved since Wednesday so it is still halted. | MEOA | 05/06/2023 | Halt appeared in the data on 6/2/2023 with a backdated start date of 05/06/2023. Resume is showing at 6/2/2023, but it was trading during the month between those dates. | SNMP | I also track the ratio of total halts in a time period to the sum of the number of individual stocks that were traded during the duration of that period. The daily values bounced around a lot this week with a low in the 11th percentile on Friday and a high in the 89th percentile on Wednesday. The 5 day average was between the 50th and 70th percentiles all week. The 20 day average remained above the 90th percentile all week, but that is just the 5 days with a 5 day average above 100 from the beginning of the month remaining in the data. The 50 day average fell down to the 82nd percentile by Friday this week, which was kind of expected since 50 days from March 13 when there were over 200 halts in a single day was on Monday. The daily, 5 day, and 20 day total halts are a simple sum (sum the tickers from the data for the daily, sum the daily totals for the multi day totals). The Daily tickers with halts, 5 day total tickers with halts, and 20 day total tickers with halts only count any individual ticker once. If a ticker has 5 halts in one day, it still only counts as 1 ticker that day. If a ticker halts 3 different days it only counts as ticker in the 5 or 20 day totals. All of the percentages are actually percentiles and are calculated as percentile=100*(1-x/n) where x is the number of days with an equal or higher number of halts than the day being looked at and n is the number of days in the data (891 this week). I am also including a table giving the cutoff values for 70th, 80th and 90th percentiles in total and unique halts for the daily, 5 day, 20 day, and 50 day averages. This value will change from week to week and be applied retroactively to all past dates. Percentile target values Percentile | Daily total halts (value from last week) | Daily Unique halts (value from last week) | 5 Day average total [sum] | 5 day average unique halts [sum] | 20 day average total [sum] | 20 day average unique halts [sum] | 50 day average total [sum] | 50 day average unique halts [sum] | 70th | 26 (26) | 14 (14) | 26.4 [132] (26.4) | 10.8 [54] (10.8) | 26.65 [533] (26.55) | 9.30 [186] (9.30) | 29.00 [1450] (28.94) | 7.86 [393] (7.86) | 80th | 34 (34) | 16 (16) | 30.8 [154] (30.8) | 12.6 [63] (12.6) | 32.50 [650] (32.05) | 10.30 [206] (10.30) | 32.84 [1642] (32.82) | 9.14 [457] (9.16) | 90th | 51 (51) | 22 (22) | 43.8 [219] (43.8) | 17.4 [87] (17.4) | 43.60 [872] (43.75) | 13.40 [268] (13.40) | 39.24 [1962] (39.46) | 11.02 [551] (11.04) | Past 5 trading days actual halts totals Date | Daily total halts | Daily unique tickers with halts | 5 Day average [total] (percentile) halts | 5 Day unique tickers with halts | 20 day average [total] (percentile) halts | 20 day unique tickers with halts | 50 day average [total] (percentile) halts | 50 day unique tickers with halts | 05/30 | 9 (19.81%) | 7 (23.29%) | 19.8 (52.80%) | 7.6 (39.26%) | 39.15 (86.56%) | 9.85 (74.30%) | 33.58 (82.00%) | 7.46 (59.33%) | 05/31 | 23 (64.81%) | 8 (31.82%) | 20.8 (55.24%) | 6.6 (28.78%) | 34.75 (82.47%) | 9.30 (69.46%) | 33.48 (81.67%) | 7.38 (57.56%) | 06/01 | 29 (75.24%) | 11 (54.27%) | 17.2 (43.21%) | 7.0 (32.91%) | 32.45 (79.89%) | 8.95 (66.34%) | 33.82 (82.44%) | 7.36 (57.22%) | 06/02 | 14 (38.67%) | 8 (31.82%) | 16.4 (40.21%) | 6.2 (23.60%) | 27.30 (70.86%) | 8.00 (55.27%) | 33.46 (81.56%) | 7.34 (56.89%) | Percentages in the following tables are calculated by dividing the column being looked at by the corresponding total number of trading days column and then multiplying by 100, this is not a percentile, but a percentage. All values between 33% and 66%) above the target (percent expected*1.33, or percent expected*1.66) will be bolded, all values 66% above the target and above will be bolded and italic. Total halts comparisons Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 949 | 28.87% | 18.97% | 9.69% | 52 weeks | 250 | 42.00% | 26.00% | 11.20% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 44.24% | 28.57% | 12.90% | Unique halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 949 | 26.34% | 19.70% | 9.69% | 52 weeks | 250 | 35.20% | 23.60% | 8.00% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 36.87% | 24.42% | 8.76% | 5 day trailing average of total halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 945 | 29.63% | 19.89% | 9.95% | 52 weeks | 250 | 46.00% | 27.20% | 13.20% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 51.61% | 31.34% | 15.21% | 5 day trailing average of unique halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 945 | 29.84% | 19.89% | 9.95% | 52 weeks | 250 | 34.40% | 22.80% | 6.40% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 36.41% | 23.96% | 7.37% | 20 day trailing average of total halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 930 | 29.89% | 19.89% | 9.89% | 52 weeks | 250 | 48.00% | 32.40% | 8.40% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 55.30% | 37.33% | 9.68% | 20 day trailing average of unique halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 930 | 29.89% | 19.78% | 9.89% | 52 weeks | 250 | 37.60% | 19.20% | 0 (0.00%) | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 42.40% | 22.12% | 0 (0.00%) | 50 day trailing average of total halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 900 | 29.89% | 19.89% | 9.89% | 52 weeks | 250 | 42.80% | 16.40% | 5.20% | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 49.31% | 18.89% | 5.99% | 50 day trailing average of unique halts comparison Time Frame | Total number of trading days | Number (actual percentage) of days above 70th percentile (expect 30% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 80th percentile (expect 20% for all) | Number (actual percentage) of days above 90th percentile (expect 10% for all) | Since August 23, 2019 | 900 | 29.67% | 19.89% | 9.89% | 52 weeks | 250 | 32.40% | 6.40% | 0 (0.00%) | Since 7/29/22 | 217 | 37.33% | 7.37% | 0 (0.00% | All tickers with halts in the last 5 trading days Total number of halts | Ticker | Halts Tuesday | Halts Wednesday | Halts Thursday | Halts Friday | 1 | EDTXU | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | GDC | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | QSG | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | TOP | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | MNPR | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | CDRO | 1 | - | - | - | 4 | FISK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | LAES | - | 2 | 2 | - | 28 | SDA | - | 15 | 9 | 4 | 1 | GDEV | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | MRVI | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | SFWL | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | ROCAU | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | NEPH | - | 1 | - | - | 6 | TYGO | - | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | JWAC | - | - | 2 | - | 6 | UCAR | - | - | 5 | 1 | 1 | TRKA | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | REUN | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | PBLA | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | CVNA | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | NCNO | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | VGAS | - | - | - | 1 | 4 | ELTX | - | - | - | 4 | 1 | GRP U | - | - | - | 1 | It has been 217 trading days since activity spiked from 16 halts on 14 tickers on July 27 to 75 halts on 20 tickers on July 28. Just 2 trading days later (August 2) total halts broke 100 for the 4th time in my dataset (116 halts on 28 ticker on August 2). No tickers that halted between Jan 22 and Feb 2 of 2021 had any halts this week. Here is the table with the halts on GME and the Headphone stock during the sneeze these two tickers get mentioned every week for obvious reasons on GME, but Headphone actually had more total halts and only 1 less day in a row with halts than we did. Date | GME halts | Headphone halts | 01/22 | 3 | 0 | 01/25 | 9 | 4 | 01/26 | 5 | 2 | 01/27 | 3 | 26 | 01/28 | 19 | 21 | 01/29 | 1 | 11 | 02/01 | 1 | 2 | 02/02 | 5 | 2 | Historical top 10 days with most halts on a single ticker (3 entries from this year) Date | Ticker(s) with 31 or more halts | Number of halts on Ticker(s) | Daily percent change (close to close, from open to close, previous close to maximum/minimum) | 02/10/2020 (leadup to pandemic) | FMCIU (Forum Merger II Corporation Unit) | 60 | (+0.63%, -15.50%) but volume was super low so may not be accurate | 06/08/2020 (Aftershocks of pandemic) | HVT-A (Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. Class A) | 59 | volume too low to determine | 03/12/2020 (pandemic) | A-M-C-I-U (avoiding swapcorn filter) (A-m-c-i Acquisition Corp. II) | 53 | volume too low to determine | 03/13/2023 (This year) | WAL (Western Alliance Bancorporation) | 46 | (-47.06%, +102.64%, -84.88%) | 12/09/2022 (recent activity) | AMAM (Ambrx Biopharma Inc.) | 44 | (+1,007.59%, +288.03%, +1007.59%) | 03/24/2020 (pandemic) | IMAC (IMAC holdings Inc.) | 42 | (+1,025.26%, 147.50%) | 08/02/2022 (recent activity) | APDN (Applied Dna Sciences) | 38 | (+311.15%, +110.53%, +538.77%) | 01/03/2023 (This year) | JSPR (Jasper Therapeutics, Inc.) | 38 | (467.29%, 82.67%, 686.75%) | 03/16/2020 (pandemic) | MDIA (Mediaco Holding Inc.) | 37 | volume too low to determine | 03/13/2023 (This year) | FRC (First Republic Bank) | 37 | (-61.83%, +16.63%, -78.56%) | Here are the currently active tracking charts that I post and update every week. The last of the following charts (Ratio of total halts to unique halts) uses a simple sum of unique daily halts so it can double count the same ticker if it halted multiple days in that period, this is the only point in any of my calculations where 2 different halts on the same ticker actually count as 2 halts and not a single unique ticker halting, it still won't count multiple halts in a single day as separate halts, but a ticker like QSG would show 2 unique halts this week even though it had more halts than that on 1 of the 2 days it had halts. 52 week total halts 52 week unique halts Current halts Current unique halts Total halts going back to 2019 for scale Unique halts data going back to 2019 for scale Ratio of total halts to unique tickers Total halts daily distribution Unique halts daily distribution Top 10 days with most tickers with halts since August 2019 Date | Unique halts | 03/18/2020 (Pandemic) | 643 | 03/19/2020 (Pandemic) | 572 | 03/16/2020 (Pandemic) | 554 | 03/12/2020 (Pandemic) | 474 | 03/09/2020 (Pandemic) | 327 | 03/23/2020 (Pandemic) | 279 | 03/20/2020 (Pandemic) | 270 | 03/24/2020 (Pandemic) | 252 | 03/17/2020 (Pandemic) | 208 | 03/13/2020 (Pandemic) | 200 | Top 10 days with latest resume times (that still resumed the same day) Date | Latest resume time | 03/13/2020 (Pandemic) | 16:59:17 EST | 11/18/2020 | 16:52:24 EST | 11/2/2020 | 16:50:51 EST | 04/9/2020 | 16:47:56 EST | 02/17/2023 (Last month) | 16:35:00 EST | 09/30/2022 (recent activity) | 16:23:15 EST | 03/20/2020 (Pandemic) | 16:21:29 EST | 12/09/2020 | 16:20:28 EST | 01/15/2021 (Sneeze) | 16:20:14 EST | 12/15/2021 | 16:17:29 EST | GME is still the only true play, I am not suggesting that anyone invest in other companies, I am simply tracking market halts as a metric for volatility. Here are the plots for each full calendar year, as well as the 2 other periods where total halts broke 100 in a single day 2020 total halts 2020 unique halts 2021 total halts 2021 unique halts 2022 total halts 2022 unique halts Pandemic crash total halts Pandemic crash unique halts Sneeze total halts Sneeze unique halts submitted by jab136 to Superstonk [link] [comments] |
2023.06.02 23:28 Common-Formal-10 Locator 62 success timeline
DOT 6/21 3/3 applied two minors passports at USPS 3/8 received by locator 62, in process on the website 5/9 contacted my congresswoman and she forward my upgrade expedited request and cc info to Dept of State and also my travel itinerary
5/11 I also emailed expedited service request and cc info to NPIC
5/24 got worried, no charge deduct from cc, no update from congresswoman office. So I reached out to senator office, the staff was very helpful and told me, better to stay with one representative so it won’t delay any process, she even called the my congress caseworker made sure everything is on track and told me I am in the good hand.
5/26@ 10pm, I received two separate emails said my two minor applications are in process ( which I read many people got this email and got approved within a day or two)
Memorial weekend office closed
5/30 @12pm, received two separate emails show both applications are approved
5/30 @5pm, received email from congresswoman office with tracking numbers with priority mail
5/31 shipped from Tucson, AZ
Website never move to shipped
6/2 passport in hand
Note: they never accept or charge my expedited service request and expedited shipping.
I have this app called SHOP, surprisingly they sent me the tracking information as soon as the shipping label was created(it showed was from house.gov), the inform delivery from USPS won’t show up until the day of delivery.
Thank you for all the help and support from this group, I am really appreciated. Also, big thanks to my caseworker Stacey for pushing the inquiry for me. I will continue stay here to assist other people and hearing their good news too😊
submitted by
Common-Formal-10 to
Passports [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:28 kisuarly f20 looking for more discord friends :) [friendship]
hi𐐪♡𐑂 i’m seeking cool souls who knows how to hold conversations/ just be themselves .. let’s pick each other’s brains + vibe effortlessly.. mayb watch some anime/ movies together _. i also don’t mind VC’s
a bit about me * i love creating art , spending time w/ my puppy & listening to music. i love watching sci-fi / psychology/ mystery shows , spirituality/ science / existentialism/ super natural creatures , i love kawaii , interior designing c simulation games & cod mobile lolz etc hoping to find others who have the same interests! i love listening to lil peep & crying lolz.
messages that show low effort won’t b responded back to , okie bye my timezone is ( est)
submitted by
kisuarly to
MeetPeople [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:27 PrismArtCollective Half hour left to get in on the Starcat presale! Only a small number of extra will be ordered - LEs are extremely low! Presale ends @5pm CST 6/2
| Prismartcollective.com Singles are $32+ shipping and we do have some sets still available as well! These are the accompaniment to the 2022 Stargirl design ✨ submitted by PrismArtCollective to Pins [link] [comments] |
2023.06.02 23:26 RNGtan Space Cleric (Heavy Armor Scoundrel Consular)
| I am currently still frustrated at making an Armored Caster work in K2 in a way that isn't just strictly outclassed by going naked. To blow off some steam, let's play a bit of K1 where Armored Casters are much more competitive. Caster Setup Combat/Sustain Setup This build is trying to fulfill a bunch of conditions in order of importance: - 40 Force DC
- 100% beats Young Rancor with Insanity
- 40 Defense
- Cap avoid against common enemies on the LS route
- 36 Attack
- Caps hit against Final Boss with Master Critical Strike
- 33 Attack outside of the Final Boss is enough to cap against the turrets
- 1 buff is assumed to be online all the time
- Extended Speed allowed
- 2 buffs against bosses allowed if necessary
- Immunity Mind-Affecting required
Disclaimer: This build isn't the most practical build in the game. The primary goal is to hit a bunch of benchmarks, and in order to do so I play a 8 CON Scoundrel. This character has the worst possible Fortitude save in the game for a protagonist, in a game that frequently checks it. They also have the worst possible Vitality, so expect to get one-rounded by crits in the early game. That said, I try to come online at the beginning of Dantooine instead of after the third map like most of the gish builds do. Why Heavy Armor? Having access to Heavy Armor allows you to equip the Cassus Fett's Battle Armor right after leaving the Jedi Enclave. Defense-wise, it is almost as strong as the Heavy Exoskeleton, but available much earlier. It certainly is the strongest on a Scoundrel, who is 4 Defense ahead of a Soldier, but most Scoundrels don't even consider Heavy Armor. Novelty value. The other item it enables is the Sith Mask. It comes with Immunity: Mind-Affecting and FP regeneration, as well as Weapon Focus, which we don't pick up in this build. Intermission: Dantooine Mid-game Setup As said, one of the perks of this build is Cassus Fett's Battle Armor. At 37 Defense we cap Defense against pretty much anything but boss encounters, most notably Sherruk and the Albino Kath Hound. At 10 DEX it also provides 1 more Defense than the Heavy Exoskeleton at the cost of 2 STR (and 3 CON), so that is what we use for most of the playthrough. If you take all the Persuade money options on Taris as a Scoundrel, you will end up with around 10k to 11k credits. If you intend to buy the armor as early as possible, I recommend to sell some items on the Taris Upper City shops. They pay you 40% for the item value, which is slightly less than 65% of the Yavin shop post-Dantooine, but more than the default 25% otherwise. Build ATTRIBUTES STR - 16 (18) DEX - 10 CON - 8 INT - 8 WIS - 15 (17) CHA - 16 (17) LEVELS 1: Scoundrel(1): Dueling 2: Scoundrel(2): Armor Proficiency Medium 3: Scoundrel(3) 4: Scoundrel(4): STR+1, (STR=17) 5: Scoundrel(5): Improved Dueling 6: Scoundrel(6) 7: Scoundrel(7) 8: Scoundrel(8): WIS+1, Master Dueling, (WIS=16) 9: Jedi Consular(1): Armor Proficiency Medium 10: Jedi Consular(2) 11: Jedi Consular(3): Improved Critical Strike 12: Jedi Consular(4): CHA+1, (CHA=17) 13: Jedi Consular(5) 14: Jedi Consular(6): Master Critical Strike 15: Jedi Consular(7) 16: Jedi Consular(8): WIS+1, (WIS=17) 17: Jedi Consular(9): Implant Level 1 18: Jedi Consular(10): 19: Jedi Consular(11): 20: Jedi Consular(12): STR+1, Implant Level 1, (STR=18) SKILLS 1: Save(12) 2: Save(15) 3: Save(18) 4: Save(21) 5: Save(24) 6: Save(27) 7: Save(30) 8: Persuade(7), Save(26) // Allows you to clear all Taris checks 9: Save(27) 10: Demolitions(11), Awareness(7), Repair(12), Save(4) // Remove Average Mines 11: Save(5) 12: Save(6) 13: Save(7) 14: Demolitions(6), Awareness(2) // Remove Deadly Mines with Demolitions Sensor (Korriban) 15: Computer Use(1) 16: Computer Use(1) 17: Computer Use(1) 18: Computer Use(1) 19: Computer Use(1) 20: Computer Use(1) POWERS 9: Forcec Speed, Knight Speed 10: Fear 11: Horror 12: Insanity 13: Force Push, Force Whirlwind 14: Stun Droid 15: Master Speed 16: Stun 17: Force Wave, Stasis 18: Disable Droid 19: Destroy Droid 20: Slow submitted by RNGtan to kotor [link] [comments] |
2023.06.02 23:26 CSGOMatchThreads Astralis vs MOUZ / IEM Dallas 2023 - Quarter-Final / Post-Match Discussion
Inferno: 20-22
Ancient: 9-16
Nuke Map picks:
Full Match Stats:
Individual Map Stats:
Map 1: Inferno
Team | CT | T | OT | Total |
🇩🇰 Astralis | 9 | 6 | 5 | 20 |
| T | CT | OT | |
🇪🇺 MOUZ | 6 | 9 | 7 | 22 |
Map 2: Ancient
Team | T | CT | Total |
🇩🇰 Astralis | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| CT | T | |
🇪🇺 MOUZ | 10 | 6 | 16 |
This thread was created by the Post-Match Team. If you want to share any feedback or have any concerns, please message
u/CSGOMatchThreads.
submitted by
CSGOMatchThreads to
GlobalOffensive [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:25 AutoModerator [Download Course] Mindvalley – Courses Collection (34 Courses) Download (Genkicourses.com)
| Get the course here: [Download Course] Mindvalley – Courses Collection (34 Courses) Download Our website: https://www.genkicourses.site/product/mindvalley-courses-collection-34-courses-download/ These are the courses included in the bundle - Psychology of Winning
- Longevity Quest
- Unlocking Transcendence
- Rapid Transformation Therapy
- Ferocity
- Speak and Inspire
- Energy Medicine
- Unlimited Abundance
- Uncompromised Life
- Love or Above
- Vishen Lakhiani – Becoming Limitless
- Becoming a Modern Money Master
- Tantra Touch
- Sleep Mastery
- Jeffrey Allen – Duality
- Dr. Shefali Tsabary – Conscious Parenting Mastery
- Jim Kwik – Super Reading
- Dr. Michael Breus – The Mastery of Sleep
- Christine Bullock – Total Transformation Training
- Anodea Judith – Chakra Healing
- Vishen Lakhiani – Extraordinary by Design
- Katherine Woodward Thomas – Conscious Uncoupling
- Michael Beckwith – Life Visioning Mastery
- 5 Days to a Powerful Memory – Jim Kwik
- Eric Edmeades – 7 Days to Breaking Up with Sugar
- Ajit Nawalkha (Mindvalley & Evercoach) – First-Serve
- Andrew Holecek – Dream Sculpting
- Eric Edmeades – The WildFit Program
- Feng Shui for Life by Marie Diamond – Mindvalley
- Yoga Quest with Cecilia Sardeo
- The Japanese Art of Healing Your Money Wounds with Ken Honda
- Barbara Marx Hurbard – Evolutionary Woman
- Consciousness Engineering
- Vishen Lakhiani – The 6 Phase Meditation
If you're wondering why our courses are priced lower than the original prices and are feeling a bit suspicious (which is understandable), we can provide proof of the course's contents. We can provide a screenshot of the course's contents or send you a freebie, such as an introduction video or another video from the course, to prove that we do have the course. Should you wish to request proof, we kindly ask you to reach out to us. Please be aware that our courses do not include community access. This is due to the fact that we do not have the authority to manage this feature. Despite our desire to incorporate this aspect, it is, unfortunately, unfeasible. Explore affordable learning at Genkicourses.site 🎓! Dive into a world of quality courses handpicked just for you. Download, watch, and achieve more without breaking your budget. submitted by AutoModerator to BestCoursesAreHere [link] [comments] |
2023.06.02 23:23 ImAThrowawayAcccct [WTS] 11.5 BA Barrel $80
Timestamp:
https://imgur.com/a/2TSsFXe 11.5 BA Barrel: $80
- Bought new and barely used. I zeroed in and shot a few afterward. Shot about 30-40 rounds
Post Rules General Etiquette for GAFS - All prices are PayPal F&F and include shipping 🚢
- Prices are negotiable, feel free to send an offer!
- Comment on the post first. Transactions will not proceed until that's done
- Please no ghosting! I will wait 1 hour for payment unless you give a valid reason for a delay or if it's late at night and I'm asleep.
- Dibs beat PMs. If you're sure you'll buy an item but have a quick question, let me know in your comment and I'll consider it a dibs. If it's been 1 hour with no questions/interest/response, I'll move on to the next person in line. Ultimately, who I choose to sell it is at my discretion
- Venmo or PayPal is available
- Only 11+ flairs are allowed to pay using Goods & Services. If you do not want to pay the fee, do not use G&S.
- No notes in any payments (except an un-gun-related emoji if using Venmo). Here's why.
submitted by
ImAThrowawayAcccct to
GunAccessoriesForSale [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:22 EurekaStockade 61---Now or Never--How an Art Festival signalled Stock Market crash on 17 August
| 2 June--News item about an Art Festival in Melbourne, Australia Suggestively titled--- Now or Never Obvious Globalist signalling NOW OR NEVER= 149 SKULL AND BONES= 149 DESTRUCTION= 149 Even more significant is the date the 'festival' begins-- 17 August= 229th Day of the Year WALL STREET MINI CRASH= 229 11 months 9 days after Queen Elizabeth's death DEATH OF A QUEEN= 229 2 June= Now or Never Art festival story appears on Queen Elizabeth's Coronation date 77 days later-- 17 August SEVENTY SEVEN= 149 NOW OR NEVER= 149 Last year the Dow dipped below 30,000 points on 30 Sep 2022 322 days later-- 17 August 2023 17 AUGUST 2023 STOCK MARKET CRASHES =322 https://preview.redd.it/kzesw6t7xn3b1.png?width=940&format=png&auto=webp&s=dffa6c8fea04614d7f4ebc7b1dcf0000d4f32326 Signalling events-- 17 August= Day 229 of the Year CHEMICAL SPILL= 229 3 Feb--Toxic Chemical Spill in Ohio 2023 PALESTINE OHIO CHEMICAL SPILL= 277 27 weeks 7 days later-- 17 August STOCK MARKET CRASHES= 277 25 April 2022 115th Day of the Year Last year Elon Musk offers to buy Twitter TWITTER= 115 115 days later-- 17 August This year on 11 May--Elon Musk announced he was stepping down as Twitter CEO in 6 weeks 11 May= 11/5 TWITTER= 115 SIX WEEKS= 115 ELON MUSK STEPS DOWN AS TWITTER CEO= 115 STOCK MARKET CRASHES= 115 10 Mar-- Silicon Valley Bank crashed 66.6% Exactly 7777 days after Enron collapsed on 28 Nov 2001 15 March--Ides of March Credit Suisse crashed 22.3% 155 days later-- 17 August DOW CRASHES= 155 20 March-- Equinox--Xi visits Putin in Moscow XI VISITS PUTIN IN MOSCOW= 322 223 days later-- 94th anniv of the Great Wall St Crash on 29 Oct 1929 29 Oct 1929 WALL STREET CRASH= 119 18 Jan--a Blue Spiral appeared in the sky over Hawaii 15 April--a Blue Spiral appeared in the sky over Alaska BLUE SPIRAL= 115 STOCK MARKET CRASHES= 115 https://preview.redd.it/w3pvo2li2o3b1.png?width=618&format=png&auto=webp&s=9ff1e148f5b2ada118c29e04f1f24baf1d044ef2 Blue Spiral--Globalist Bat Signal submitted by EurekaStockade to conspiracy [link] [comments] |
2023.06.02 23:22 jjgrey05 At The Market Offering Agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC
We have entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“
Wainwright”) relating to the sale of our common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“
Common Stock”), offered by this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. In accordance with the terms of the At The Market Offering Agreement, we may offer and sell up to $50,000,000 of shares of our Common Stock from time to time through Wainwright acting as agent.
Sales of our Common Stock, if any, under this prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus may be made in sales deemed to be “at the market equity offerings” as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “
Securities Act”), including sales made directly on or through Nasdaq or any other existing trading market in the United States for our Common Stock, sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or otherwise, directly to Wainwright as principal, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices and/or in any other method permitted by law. If we and Wainwright agree on any method of distribution other than sales of shares of our common stock on or through Nasdaq or another existing trading market in the United States at market prices, we will file a further prospectus supplement providing all information about such offering as required by Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act. Wainwright is not required to sell any specific dollar amount of shares but will use its commercially reasonable efforts to sell on our behalf all of the shares of common stock requested to be sold by us, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable laws and regulations, subject to the terms of the At The Market Offering Agreement on mutually agreed terms between Wainwright and us. There is no arrangement for funds to be received in any escrow, trust or similar arrangement.
Wainwright will be entitled to compensation at a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross sales price per share sold under the At The Market Offering Agreement. In connection with the sale of our common stock on our behalf, Wainwright will be deemed to be an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act and the compensation of Wainwright will be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts. We have also agreed to provide indemnification and contribution to Wainwright with respect to certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” under the federal securities laws and are subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. See “
Prospectus Supplement Summary ‒ Emerging Growth Company” and ”‒ Smaller Reporting Company.” Our Common Stock and warrants are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “ADN” and “ADNWW”, respectively. On June 1, 2023, the closing price of our Common Stock was $0.88 per share and the closing price of our warrants was $0.11 per share.
You should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement carefully before you invest.
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See the information contained under “Risk Factors” on page 5 of this prospectus supplement and in the related sections noted in the accompanying prospectus, and in the documents incorporated by reference herein and therein. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. THE OFFERING Securities offered Shares of our Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000.
Common Stock to be Outstanding after this offering(1) Up to 106,818,182 shares of Common Stock, assuming sales of 56,818,181 shares of Common Stock in this offering at an assumed offering price of $0.88 per share, which was the last reported sale price of our shares of Common Stock on Nasdaq on June 1, 2023. The actual number of shares of Common Stock issued will vary depending on the sales price under this offering at which shares may be sold from time to time during this offering.
Manner of offering “At the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) under the Securities Act that may be made from time to time through our sales agent, Wainwright. See “
Plan of Distribution” on page S-12 of this prospectus supplement.
Use of Proceeds We intend to use the net proceeds to fund the operating expenses and capital expenses for product development and plan to make substantial investments over the next several years, among others, in new production equipment and warehousing, systems assembly line, MEA assembly automation, aeronautical stacks, facility expansion, new hirings and for working capital and general corporate purposes. See “
Use of Proceeds” on page S-11 of this prospectus supplement.
Risk Factors Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See the “
Risk Factors” section of this prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement for a discussion of factors to consider before deciding to purchase our securities.
Trading Symbols Our Common Stock and warrants are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “ADN” and “ADNWW”, respectively.
(1) The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after this offering is based on 53,097,236 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 1, 2023, and does not include (a) 26,369,557 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, and (b) 3,289,855 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, 2,288,772 shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units, 33,671 shares issuable upon outstanding restricted stock units that have vested, and 295,196 shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance of awards pursuant to the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. Unless otherwise indicated, this prospectus supplement assumes no exercise of outstanding stock options or warrants and no settlement of outstanding restricted stock units.
RISK FACTORS Investing in our securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks set out below and the other documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement that summarize the risks that may materially affect us and our business before making an investment in our securities. Please see “
Incorporation by Reference”. If any of these risks occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks set out in this prospectus supplement are not the only risks we face. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this prospectus supplement as well as those incorporated by reference herein and therein, including financial statements and the related notes, for further risks faced by us.
The Company and its securities should be considered a speculative investment due to the high-risk nature of our business, and you should carefully consider all of the information disclosed in this prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and the documents incorporated herein and therein prior to making an investment in the Company. In addition, the following risk factors should be given special consideration when evaluating an investment in the securities.
Risks Related to the Business We have incurred losses since inception and we expect that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. We have not been profitable since operations commenced, and we may never achieve or sustain profitability. We expect to continue to incur net losses and generate negative cash flows until we can produce sufficient revenues and gross profit to cover our costs. We may never become profitable. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase our profitability in the future. We will require significant additional capital to continue operations and to implement our business strategy. We cannot estimate with reasonable certainty the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development, manufacture and commercialization of our products and there is no certainty that we will be able to raise the necessary capital on reasonable terms or at all.
Our audited financial statements included a statement that there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and a continuation of negative financial trends could result in our inability to continue as a going concern.
Our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 were prepared on the assumption that we would continue as a going concern. Our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 did not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our management has determined that there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months based on the insufficient amount of cash and cash equivalents as of the financial statement filing date and our independent auditors have included a “going concern” explanatory paragraph in their report on our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. In July 2022, we received official ratification from the European Commission of the European Union for one of the Important Projects of Common European Interest (“
IPCEI”), Green HiPo. This project provides for the availability of funding of €782.1 million over the next six years. As of the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements, we have not received an agreement which provides the terms of the funding. In addition to Green HiPo, management may pursue additional capital raises in the future. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funding, we could be required to delay our development efforts, limit activities and reduce research and development costs, which could adversely affect its business prospects. The reaction of investors to the inclusion of a going concern statement by our independent auditors, and our potential inability to continue as a going concern, could materially adversely affect the price of our Common Stock.
We continue to generate a low level of revenue from our core products. Based on conversations with existing customers and incoming inquiries from prospective customers, we anticipate substantial increased demand for our MEAs and fuel cell systems from a wide range of customers as we scale up our production facilities and testing capabilities, and as the awareness of our MEA capabilities becomes widely known in the industry. We expect both existing customers to increase order volume, and to generate substantial new orders from new customers, with some of whom we are already in discussions regarding prospective commercial partnerships and joint development agreements. As of December 31, 2022, we were still generating a low level of revenues compared to our future projections and have not made any commercial sales to new customers.
Risks Related to the Offering A return on the Common Stock purchased in this offering is not guaranteed. There is no guarantee that the shares of Common Stock purchased in this offering will earn any positive return in the short term or long term. Investing in our Common Stock is speculative and involves a high degree of risk and should be undertaken only by holders whose financial resources are sufficient to enable them to assume such risks and who have no need for immediate liquidity in their investment. Investing in our securities is appropriate only for holders who have the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of their holdings.
We may not be able to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. To maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that our closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share.
On May 24, 2023, we were notified by Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Staff about bid price deficiency. The Company is reviewing plans to regain compliance with the $1.00 closing bid price requirement. If the Company does not regain compliance with the bid price requirement by November 30, 2023, the Company may be eligible for an additional 180-calendar day compliance period so long as it satisfies the criteria for initial listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market and the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and the Company provides written notice to Nasdaq of its intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary. If we fail to continue to meet all applicable continued listing requirements for The Nasdaq Capital Market in the future and Nasdaq determines to delist our common stock, the delisting could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock, our ability to obtain financing to repay debt and fund our operations.
We currently do not have enough authorized shares of common stock to issue all shares offered hereunder and we require stockholder approval and the subsequent filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a certificate of amendment to our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect an increase of the authorized number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the At The Market Offering Agreement. There is no assurance that such stockholder approval will be obtained which will limit our ability to raise capital and could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not have enough shares of Common Stock currently authorized under our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “certificate of incorporation”) to issue all shares in the offering to pursuant to the At the Market Offering Agreement. We currently have 110,000,000 shares of common stock authorized under our certificate of incorporation. As of June 1, 2023, we had 53,097,236 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, 26,369,557 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, 3,289,855 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, 2,288,772 shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units,33,671 shares issuable upon outstanding restricted stock units that have vested, and 295,196 shares available for future issuance as awards under the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. We currently do not have sufficient remaining authorized shares of Common Stock to fully utilize sales pursuant to the At The Market Offering Agreement unless and until an increase of our authorized shares of Common Stock is approved by stockholders and we file with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation effecting such increase. If our stockholders do not approve the increase of authorized shares of Common Stock, our business development and financing alternatives will be limited by the lack of sufficient unissued and unreserved authorized shares of Common Stock, and stockholder value may be harmed, perhaps severely, by this limitation.
We have used almost all of our unreserved, authorized shares. We have currently used almost all of our unreserved authorized shares and will need stockholder approval to implement an increase in our authorized shares of common stock. Our certificate of incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), currently require the approval of stockholders holding not less than a majority of all outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote in order to approve an increase in our authorized shares of common stock. We currently plan to seek stockholder approval at our annual meeting, which is scheduled to be held on June 13, 2023. There are no assurances that stockholder approval will be obtained, in which event will be unable to raise additional capital through the issuance of shares of common stock to fund our future operations.
We have broad discretion in the use of proceeds from the offering. Our management will have broad discretion with respect to the application of net proceeds received by us from the sale of the shares under this prospectus supplement and may spend such proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of the securities. Any failure by management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business or cause the price of our common shares to decline.
The Common Stock offered hereby will be sold in “at the market” offerings, and investors who buy shares at different times will likely pay different prices. Investors who purchase shares in this offering at different times will likely pay different prices, and so may experience different outcomes in their investment results. We will have discretion, subject to market demand, to vary the timing, prices, and numbers of shares sold, and there is no maximum sales price. Pursuant to the At The Market Offering Agreement, our board of directors, or a duly authorized executive committee thereof, may authorize, from time to time, a minimum sales price per share of our common stock sold in this offering, which will limit the Company’s ability to make sales if the price goes below that minimum. Investors may experience a decline in the value of their shares as a result of share sales made at prices lower than the prices they paid.
You may experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value per share of the Common Stock you purchase. The price per share of our Common Stock being offered may be higher than the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock outstanding prior to your purchase and in such case, you will suffer immediate dilution based on the difference between the price you pay per share of our Common Stock and our net tangible book value per share at the time of your purchase.
The actual number of shares we will issue and the total aggregate proceeds resulting from sales made under the At The Market Offering Agreement with Wainwright, at any one time or in total, is uncertain. Subject to certain limitations in the At The Market Offering Agreement with Wainwright and compliance with applicable law, we have the discretion to deliver sales notices to Wainwright at any time throughout the term of the At The Market Offering Agreement. The number of shares that are sold by Wainwright after delivering a sales notice will fluctuate based on the market price of the Common Stock during the sales period and limits we set with Wainwright, and as such, it is not currently possible to predict the aggregate proceeds to be raised in connection with this offering or the number of shares that will ultimately be issued.
Future issuances of securities may result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and investors. We may issue or sell additional shares of Common Stock or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into shares of Common Stock in subsequent offerings or may issue additional shares of Common Stock or other securities to finance future acquisitions. We cannot predict the size or nature of future sales or issuances of securities or the effect, if any, that such future sales and issuances will have on the market price of the shares. Sales or issuances of substantial numbers of shares of Common Stock or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common Stock, or the perception that such sales or issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of the Common Stock. With any additional sale or issuance of shares of Common Stock or other securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common Stock, our stockholders will suffer dilution to their voting power and economic interest in the Company. Furthermore, to the extent holders of our stock options, warrants or other convertible securities convert or exercise their securities and sell the shares of Common Stock they receive, the trading price of the Common Stock on Nasdaq may decrease due to the additional amount of shares available in the market.
The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile. The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. This volatility may affect the ability of holders of Common Stock to sell their securities at an advantageous price. Market price fluctuations in our Common Stock may be due to our operating results failing to meet expectations of securities analysts or investors in any period, downward revision in securities analysts’ estimates, adverse changes in general market conditions or economic trends, acquisitions, dispositions or other material public announcements by us or our competitors, along with a variety of additional factors. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock.
Financial markets have periodically at times experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of companies and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. Accordingly, the market price of our Common Stock may decline even if our operating results, underlying asset values or prospects have not changed. Additionally, these factors, as well as other related factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. There can be no assurance that continuing fluctuations in price and volume will not occur. If such increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, our operations could be adversely impacted, and the trading price of our Common Stock may be materially adversely affected.
Sales of a significant number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets, or the perception that such sales could occur, could depress the market price of our Common Stock. Sales of a significant number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets, or the perception that such sales could occur as a result of our utilization of a universal shelf registration statement, our At The Market Offering Agreement with Wainwright or otherwise, could depress the market price of our Common Stock and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of our Common Stock or the market perception that we are permitted to sell a significant number of our securities would have on the market price of our Common Stock.
Resales of our Common Stock in the public market during this offering by our stockholders may cause the market price of our Common Stock to fall. We may issue shares of Common Stock from time to time in connection with this offering. The issuance from time to time of these new shares of Common Stock, or our ability to issue new shares of Common Stock in this offering, could result in resales of shares our Common Stock by our current stockholders concerned about the potential dilution of their holdings. In turn, these resales could have the effect of depressing the market price for our Common Stock.
A liquid market in our Common Stock on Nasdaq may not be maintained. Our stockholders may be unable to sell significant quantities of Common Stock into the public trading markets without a significant reduction in the price of their shares, or at all. There can be no assurance that there will be sufficient liquidity of the Common Stock on the trading market, and that we will continue to meet the listing requirements of Nasdaq or achieve listing on any other national securities exchange. There can be no assurance that an active and liquid market for our Common Stock will be maintained, and our stockholders may find it difficult to resell shares of Common Stock.
USE OF PROCEEDS We may issue and sell shares of Common Stock having aggregate sales proceeds of up to $50,000,000 from time to time, before deducting sales agent commissions and expenses. The amount of proceeds from this offering will depend upon the number of shares of our Common Stock sold and the market price at which they are sold. There can be no assurance that we will be able to sell any shares under or fully utilize the At The Market Offering Agreement with Wainwright.
We intend to use the net proceeds to fund the operating expenses and capital expenses for product development and plan to make substantial investments over the next several years, among others, in new production equipment and warehousing, systems assembly line, MEA assembly automation, aeronautical stacks, facility expansion, new hirings and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Accordingly, we will have broad discretion in the application of the proceeds of this offering. We incurred operating losses and negative operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the three months ended March 31, 2023. The Company expects to use the net proceeds from the offering in pursuit of its ongoing general business objectives. To that end, a substantial portion of the net proceeds from the offering are expected to be allocated to working capital requirements. To the extent that we have negative operating cash flows in future periods, we may need to deploy a portion of the net proceeds from the offering and/or our existing working capital to fund such negative cash flow.
Our ultimate use might vary substantially from what is stated in this prospectus supplement and will depend on a number of factors, including those referred to under “
Risk Factors” in the accompanying prospectus and any other factors set forth in this prospectus supplement.
The amounts and timing of our use of the net proceeds from this offering will depend on a number of factors, such as the timing and progress of any collaborative or strategic partnering efforts, and the competitive environment for our products. As of the date of this prospectus supplement, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to us from this offering. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in the timing and application of these proceeds.
All expenses relating to the offering under this prospectus supplement will be paid out of the gross proceeds of the offering.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION We have entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement with Wainwright, pursuant to which we may issue and sell from time to time shares of our Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 through Wainwright as our sales agent pursuant to this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Sales of the shares of Common Stock, if any, will be made by any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act. If we and Wainwright agree on any method of distribution other than sales of shares on or through Nasdaq or another existing trading market in the United States at market prices, we will file a further prospectus supplement providing all information about such offering as required by Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act.
Wainwright will offer shares of our Common Stock at prevailing market prices subject to the terms and conditions of the At The Market Offering Agreement as agreed upon by us and Wainwright. We will designate the number of shares which we desire to sell, the time period during which sales are requested to be made, any limitation on the number of shares that may be sold in one day and any minimum price below which sales may not be made. Subject to the terms and conditions of the At The Market Offering Agreement, Wainwright will use its commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices to sell on our behalf all of the shares requested to be sold by us. We or Wainwright may suspend the offering of the shares of Common Stock being made through Wainwright under the At The Market Offering Agreement upon proper notice to the other party.
Settlement for sales of Common Stock will occur on the second trading day or such shorter settlement cycle as may be in effect under Exchange Act Rule 15c6-1 from time to time, following the date on which any sales are made, or on some other date that is agreed upon by us and Wainwright in connection with a particular transaction, in return for payment of the net proceeds to us. Sales of our shares of our Common Stock as contemplated in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus will be settled through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company or by such other means as we and Wainwright may agree upon. There is no arrangement for funds to be received in an escrow, trust or similar arrangement.
We will pay Wainwright in cash, upon each sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the At The Market Offering Agreement, a commission of 3.0% of the gross proceeds from each sale of shares. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to this offering, the actual total public offering amount, commissions and proceeds to us, if any, are not determinable at this time. Pursuant to the terms of the At The Market Offering Agreement, we agreed to reimburse Wainwright for the documented fees and costs of its legal counsel reasonably incurred in connection with entering into the transactions contemplated by the At The Market Offering Agreement in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in the aggregate, in addition to up to a maximum of $2,500 per due diligence update session conducted in connection with each such date the Company files its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. We will report at least quarterly the number of shares of our Common Stock sold through Wainwright under the At The Market Offering Agreement, the net proceeds to us and the compensation paid by us to Wainwright in connection with the sales of shares of our Common Stock.
In connection with the sales of shares of our Common Stock on our behalf, Wainwright will be deemed to be an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and the compensation paid to Wainwright will be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts. We have agreed in the At The Market Offering Agreement to provide indemnification and contribution to Wainwright against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
The offering of our shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the At The Market Offering Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of the sale of all of the shares of our Common Stock provided for in this prospectus supplement or termination of the At The Market Offering Agreement as permitted therein.
To the extent required by Regulation M, Wainwright will not engage in any market making activities involving our Common Stock while the offering is ongoing under this prospectus supplement.
From time to time, Wainwright may provide in the future various advisory, investment and commercial banking and other services to us in the ordinary course of business, for which they may receive customary fees and commissions. However, we have no present arrangements with Wainwright for any further services.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus may be made available in electronic format on a website maintained by Wainwright, and Wainwright may distribute this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus electronically.
The foregoing does not purport to be a complete statement of the terms and conditions of the At The Market Offering Agreement. A copy of the At The Market Offering Agreement is included as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K that will be filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into the registration statement of which this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus form a part. See “
Where You Can Find More Information” and “
Incorporation of Documents By Reference”.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1744494/000182912623003885/adventtech_424b5.htm submitted by
jjgrey05 to
AdventTechnologies [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:22 Prasinus20 Fires in the Evening Shadow [Online] [5E] [8PM CST] [Roleplay heavy-ish] [LGBT+ Friendly] [Thursdays]
Hey there all, I’m looking to put together a weekly campaign running on Thursdays at 8pm CST. Session 0 would be next week on the 8th.
It would be a brand new, standard medieval fantasy setting in a wholly homebrewed world. Its one I’ve been working on, so it's quite expansive. Though there is a lot of material, I don’t expect you to memorize it all, and I fully welcome my players creating things for their own backstory. I also have plenty of lore docs upon request!
We are going to aim for a more balanced game, we will have a decent amount of combat too with a focus on world-building and party-building, so not every session is guaranteed to have a fight but it won’t be really multiple sessions without one either. We’re working off the idea that a campaign should have strong roleplay moments as well as dynamic combats, that way we all can create memories together.
Now, for the part that I’m sure you’re all waiting for. The opener!
The Country of Perul Candomen doesn’t have much in the way of heroes. It has guards, and various knightly orders that any true country has, but no real heroes. No on to really solve any long term issues. Mercenaries will always be the country’s go-to to solve some of the more… sensitive issues, but let's hope the country doesn’t need more help than standard mercenaries can handle.
The campaign starts in a small city in the valley between hills in the center of the country named Golval. An ordinarily small and sleepy, farming city that uses the fresh water and natural minerals from the nearby dormant volcano to grow their crops. But growing season has ended now, and the city is holding a festival and feast in the center of town to celebrate the harvest. The large fire they had burning in the center of town served as a beacon, a cooking place, and a good place for the community to get the cold out. But something wicked this way comes in the late autumn darkness.
To answer a few potential questions:
- I plan to use Roll20 for games and Discord for Voice Chat
- We will be starting at Level 3
- Homebrew is fine, but I have to look at it to okay it first.
- Starting equipment and other things will be covered in session 0!
We just ask for 18+ and we wanna play with other adults. I’m accepting chats and DMs if you have any questions for me about the campaign! If you’re interested in applying, the link to the google form will be attached! We’re going to try to get to everyone today but unless we close the post and close the application link, we’re still accepting! We will definitely contact people before tomorrow at the absolute latest
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScm38aAQxWtGpvwCw4EsvL8j_DqLQUOXRMLdzFsloeXngxgDA/viewform?usp=sf_link submitted by
Prasinus20 to
lfg [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:22 NIK252589 How would you rate this Center Diamond?
2023.06.02 23:19 kubybuk 20M Shadow Wizard seeking [Friendship]
Hello everyone. This nimrod (me) is neuro-impaired 😢LMFAO but yes it's true im neurodivergent (ADHD, probably autism) and imma try and make friends. I've never been good at that, guess it comes with the impaired neurons lol.
My name is Jackson and I'm 20 years old. I live in the US in EST time zone. My interest include marine biology, Ancient Rome, and philosophy. My hobbies include watching movies and documentaries, playing games, listening to music, writing and drinking ice cold water.
My MBTI is INTJ-A, so maybe that can give an idea abt me. I'm really introverted and can be kinda weird at times but who isn't? I'm looking for a couple of close friends to show me how friendships work? If that makes sense lol.
I'm not good at these introductions but I tried. Btw I'm transgender so if that bothers you, grow up. Other than that DM me and Imk some stuff abt you, and we can chat. That would be kinda cool.
submitted by
kubybuk to
MeetPeople [link] [comments]
2023.06.02 23:18 PotentialStunning218 Please help me cash out (NEW USERS 👥)
2023.06.02 23:18 gameontheshelf 36 [TF4F] EST/PA/US - Looking to Write the Next Chapter of Life with Someone Wonderful
I've made really wonderful friends here and now am hoping to meet someone with the intention of seeing if there's chemistry and going from there. My goal is a long-term relationship, but I'd like to know that I'm dating a good friend as opposed to dating a stranger I'm simply attracted to. Of course, physical attraction is important and I've included a picture below along with some information about myself, and 'you', to give you an idea of who I am and what I'm looking for. I'm not interested in a whirlwind anything or rushing head first into a new relationship; I want to build one with the right person by being mindful, intentional, and openly communicating.
I'd prefer to meet people in or near my time zone, but you don't have to be in the same state. Although not ideal, I'm open to (initially) long-distance relationships. If you're interested in speaking with me, I prefer reddit Chat over the private message feature; and if we connect and there seems to be chemistry, I'd really like to move to a different platform like Discord or WhatsApp as I appreciate calls and video chats over texting all of the time.
When you message me, tell me a bit about yourself!
Me: - What I look like:
https://imgur.com/a/IBQd503 - Introspective Introvert
- Capricorn sun, Virgo moon, Leo Rising
- On the serious side but I know when to be silly (and no, I probably won't laugh at your dad jokes)
- Neurodivergent (ADHD) + Depression + Anxiety (in counseling and on meds)
- Primary love languages are quality time, words of affirmation, and acts of service
- Married (and divorced) once - Childfree; I'd consider getting married again, but I don't want kids
- Monogamous
- As content in conversation as I am with shared silence
- Enjoys writing (currently working on a novel), reading (favorite book: Jane Eyre), being creative and artsy (check out my post history), spending time with my dog, playing Animal Crossing, binging TV shows (currently watching Farscape), playing board games, and being outdoors
- Can be very passionate about my interests and hobbies and love to share them with others (some of my interests include astrology, psychology, philosophy, spirituality, and antiques)
- Learning sign language to better communicate with and train my deaf dog
You: - Introspective, self-aware, and mindful
- Kind, considerate, and compassionate
- Are probably a little goofy at times
- Always curious and learning
- Romantic at heart
- LGBTQ+ friendly & Left-leaning
- Good emotional intelligence & comfortable with being vulnerable
- Not a heavy drinker, or cigarette smoker--but cannabis-friendly
- Childfree
submitted by
gameontheshelf to
R4R30Plus [link] [comments]